The work budget of rough faults

被引:17
作者
Newman, Phiala J. [1 ]
Griffith, W. Ashley [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Work budget; Fault roughness; Fractal geometry; Seismic energy; SAN-ANDREAS FAULT; SLIP SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; STRESS-DROP; APPARENT STRESS; HAYWARD FAULT; HEAT-FLOW; DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKES; EVOLUTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tecto.2014.08.007
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Faults in nature have measurable roughness at many scales and are not planar as generally idealized. We utilize the boundary element method to model the geomechanical response of synthetic rough faults in an isotropic, linear elastic continuum to external tectonic loading in terms of the work budget. Faults are generated with known fractal roughness parameters, including the root mean square slope (beta), a measure of roughness amplitude, and the Hurst exponent (H), a measure of geometric self-similarity. Energy within the fault models is partitioned into external work (W-ext), internal elastic strain energy (W-int), gravitational work (W-gnav), frictional work (W-fric), and seismic energy (W-seis). Results confirm that W-ext, or work done on the external model boundaries, is smallest for a perfectly planar fault, and steadily increases with increasing beta. This pattern is also observed in W-int, the energy expended in deforming the host rock. The opposite is true for gravitational work, or work done against gravity in uplifting host rock, as well as with frictional work, or energy dissipated with frictional slip on the fault, and W-seis, or seismic energy released during slip events. Effects of variation in H are not as large as for beta, but W-grav, W-fric, and W-seis increase with increasing H, with W-int and W-ext decreasing across the same range. Remarkably, however, for a narrow range of roughness amplitudes which are commonly observed along natural faults, the total work of the system remains approximately constant, while slightly larger than the total work of a planar fault. Faults evolve toward the most mechanically efficient configuration; therefore we argue that this range of roughness amplitudes may represent an energy barrier, preventing faults from removing asperities and evolving to smooth, planar discontinuities. A similar conclusion is drawn from simulations at relatively shallow depths, with results showing that shallower faults have larger energy barriers, and can be mechanically efficient at higher roughness amplitudes. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 110
页数:11
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening? [J].
Abercrombie, RE ;
Rice, JR .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 162 (02) :406-424
[2]   Earthquake source scaling relationships from -1 to 5 M(L) using seismograms recorded at 2.5-km depth [J].
Abercrombie, RE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1995, 100 (B12) :24015-24036
[3]  
Addison P.S., 1997, Fractals and chaos. An illustrated course, Vfirst
[4]   Spatial and temporal stress drop variations in small earthquakes near Parkfield, California [J].
Allmann, Bettina P. ;
Shearer, Peter M. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2007, 112 (B4)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Cracks and Fracture
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations
[7]  
Becker AA, 1992, The Boundary Element Method in Engineering
[8]   Characterization of fault zones [J].
Ben-Zion, Y ;
Sammis, CG .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2003, 160 (3-4) :677-715
[9]   Fault Roughness at Seismogenic Depths from LIDAR and Photogrammetric Analysis [J].
Bistacchi, Andrea ;
Griffith, W. Ashley ;
Smith, Steven A. F. ;
Di Toro, Giulio ;
Jones, Richard ;
Nielsen, Stefan .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 168 (12) :2345-2363
[10]   Faults smooth gradually as function of slip [J].
Brodsky, Emily E. ;
Gilchrist, Jacquelyn J. ;
Sagy, Amir ;
Collettini, Cristiano .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2011, 302 (1-2) :185-193