Seismic response of rocking frames with top support eccentricity

被引:27
作者
Dar, Amitabh [1 ,2 ]
Konstantinidis, Dimitrios [1 ]
El-Dakhakhni, Wael [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
[2] Bruce Power, Tiverton, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
critical eccentricity; equivalent rocking block; nuclear facilities; rigid block assemblages; rocking frame; seismic stability; RIGID BLOCKS; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; COLUMNS; EARTHQUAKES; ASSEMBLIES; STABILITY; BEHAVIOR; SHAKING;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.3096
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The seismic response of rocking frames that consist of a rigid beam freely supported on rigid freestanding rectangular piers has received recent attention in the literature. Past studies have investigated the special case where, upon planar rocking motion, the beam maintains contact with the piers at their extreme edges. However, in many real scenarios, the beam-to-pier contact lies closer to the center of the pier, affecting the overall stability of the system. This paper investigates the seismic response of rocking frames under the more general case which allows the contact edge to reside anywhere in-between the center of the pier and its extreme edge. The study introduces a rocking block model that is dynamically equivalent to a rocking frame with vertically symmetric piers of any geometry. The impact of top eccentricity (ie, the distance of the contact edge from the pier's vertical axis of symmetry) on the seismic response of rocking frames is investigated under pulse excitations and earthquake records. It is concluded that the stability of a top-heavy rocking frame is highly influenced by the top eccentricity. For instance, a rocking frame with contacts at the extreme edges of the piers can be more seismically stable than a solitary block that is identical to one of the frame's piers, while a rocking frame with contacts closer to the centers of the piers can be less stable. The concept of critical eccentricity is introduced, beyond which the coefficient of restitution contributes to a greater reduction in the response of a frame than of a solitary pier.
引用
收藏
页码:2496 / 2518
页数:23
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   ON THE DYNAMIC-RESPONSE OF RIGID BODY ASSEMBLIES [J].
ALLEN, RH ;
OPPENHEIM, IJ ;
PARKER, AR ;
BIELAK, J .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1986, 14 (06) :861-876
[2]  
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005, 4305 ASCE
[3]  
[Anonymous], MATHC 15 0
[4]  
ASLAM M, 1980, J STRUCT DIV-ASCE, V106, P377
[5]   Dynamics of rocking podium structures [J].
Bachmann, J. A. ;
Vassiliou, M. F. ;
Stojadinovic, B. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (14) :2499-2517
[6]  
Beck J., 1974, EARTHQ ENG STRUCT D, V2, P637, DOI DOI 10.1002/EQE.4290020405
[7]  
Dar A, 2015, T 23 INT STRUCT MECH
[8]  
Dar A, 2013, T 22 INT STRUCT MECH
[9]  
Dar A, 2016, P 5 INT STRUCT SPEC
[10]   Evaluation of ASCE 43-05 Seismic Design Criteria for Rocking Objects in Nuclear Facilities [J].
Dar, Amitabh ;
Konstantinidis, Dimitrios ;
El-Dakhakhni, Wael W. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (11)