Comparative efficacy and safety of preserved versus preservative-free beta-blockers in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a systematic review

被引:6
作者
Skov, Anne Guldhammer [1 ]
Rives, Amalie Santaolalla [2 ]
Freiberg, Josefine [2 ]
Virgili, Gianni [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto [5 ]
Kolko, Miriam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp Glostrup, Dept Ophthalmol, Glostrup, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Drug Design & Pharmacol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Firenze, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Child Hlth NEURO, Florence, Italy
[4] AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
[5] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
beta-blockers; efficacy; glaucoma; intraocular pressure; ocular hypertension; safety; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; FREE OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION; GEL-FORMING SOLUTION; BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE; FREE TAFLUPROST; LIFETIME RISK; TIMOLOL; LATANOPROST; TOLERABILITY; INFLAMMATION;
D O I
10.1111/aos.14926
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Preservative-free topical medications have been introduced for glaucoma care to reduce ocular adverse events associated with preservatives. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of beta-blockers, or combination using beta-blockers, with and without preservatives. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were examined. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ocular and systemic side effects, and other clinical and quality of life outcomes. Of 242 records identified, seven RCTs (1125 patients) were included. The follow-up period ranged from one to 12 months. Timolol was used in five studies, and two studies used a combination (timolol with bimatoprost or dorzolamide). The difference in mean change (MD) in IOP between the preservative-free and the preserved drugs was statistically significant but not clinically relevant: (MD 0.29 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.51 mmHg, p = 0.010; moderate-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse events: Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcome was low or very low and reported in few studies. No significant difference was observed on ocular surface symptoms. Tear break-up time (TBUT) was better with preservative-free drops (p < 0.001). Schirmer's test was better in the preservative-free group (p < 0.001). Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcomes was low or very low. There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. We found no clinically relevant difference in mean change in IOP between the preserved and the preservative-free treatments. Data on adverse events used different methods and were incompletely reported. Although some measures of ocular surface health favoured preservative-free medications, more evidence is needed. The increasing use of preservative-free drops may be associated with better ocular surface and tolerability, but strong evidence from RCTs would be welcome.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 261
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Noninferiority of Preservative-free Versus BAK-preserved Latanoprost-timolol Fixed Combination Eye Drops in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [J].
Aptel, Florent ;
Pfeiffer, Norbert ;
Schmickler, Stefanie ;
Clarke, Jonathan ;
Lavin-Dapena, Cosme ;
Moreno-Montanes, Javier ;
Zarnowski, Tomasz ;
Csutak, Adrienne ;
Jugaste, Tiia ;
Volksone, Lasma ;
Astakhov, Yury S. ;
Coupier, Laurent ;
Nordmann, Jean-Philippe ;
Stalmans, Ingeborg .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2019, 28 (06) :498-506
[2]   Preservative-free versus preserved latanoprost eye drops in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension [J].
Aptel, Florent ;
Choudhry, Reena ;
Stalmans, Ingeborg .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2016, 32 (08) :1457-1463
[3]   Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond [J].
Baudouin, Christophe ;
Kolko, Miriam ;
Melik-Parsadaniantz, Stephane ;
Messmer, Elisabeth M. .
PROGRESS IN RETINAL AND EYE RESEARCH, 2021, 83
[4]   Preservatives in eyedrops: The good, the bad and the ugly [J].
Baudouin, Christophe ;
Labbe, Antoine ;
Liang, Hong ;
Pauly, Aude ;
Brignole-Baudouin, Francoise .
PROGRESS IN RETINAL AND EYE RESEARCH, 2010, 29 (04) :312-334
[5]   Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bourne, Rupert R. A. ;
Flaxman, Seth R. ;
Braithwaite, Tasanee ;
Cicinelli, Maria V. ;
Das, Aditi ;
Jonas, Jost B. ;
Keeffe, Jill ;
Kempen, John H. ;
Leasher, Janet ;
Limburg, Hans ;
Naidoo, Kovin ;
Pesudovs, Konrad ;
Resnikoff, Serge ;
Silvester, Alex ;
Stevens, Gretchen A. ;
Tahhan, Nina ;
Wong, Tien Y. ;
Taylor, Hugh R. .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2017, 5 (09) :E888-E897
[6]   Changes in ocular signs and symptoms in patients switching from bimatoprost-timolol to tafluprost-timolol eye drops: an open-label phase IV study [J].
Bourne, Rupert Richard Alexander ;
Kaarniranta, Kai ;
Lorenz, Katrin ;
Traverso, Carlo Enrico ;
Vuorinen, Jouni ;
Ropo, Auli .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (04)
[7]   Randomized Clinical Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Preservative-free Tafluprost and Timolol in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [J].
Chabi, Almira ;
Varma, Rohit ;
Tsai, James C. ;
Lupinacci, Robert ;
Pigeon, Joseph ;
Baranak, Christine ;
Noble, Liliane ;
Lines, Christopher ;
Ho, Tony W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 153 (06) :1187-1196
[8]   Bimatoprost 0.03% preservative-free ophthalmic solution versus bimatoprost 0.03% ophthalmic solution (Lumigan) for glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a 12-week, randomised, double-masked trial [J].
Day, Douglas G. ;
Walters, Thomas R. ;
Schwartz, Gail F. ;
Mundorf, Thomas K. ;
Liu, Charlie ;
Schiffman, Rhett M. ;
Bejanian, Marina .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 97 (08) :989-993
[9]  
Dietze J., 2020, JUVENILE GLAUCOMA
[10]   Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients [J].
Easty, DL ;
Nemeth-Wasmer, G ;
Vounatsos, JP ;
Girard, B ;
Besnainou, N ;
Pouliquen, P ;
Delval, L ;
Rouland, JF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 90 (05) :574-578