Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation

被引:141
作者
Tvinnereim, Endre [1 ]
Mehling, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Uni Res Rokkan Ctr, POB 7810, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[2] MIT, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Global warming; Climate change; Emissions; Carbon prices; Mitigation; TECHNOLOGY POLICIES; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; CLIMATE; EMISSIONS; INSTRUMENT; INNOVATION; TARGETS; TAXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.020
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Experts frequently point to carbon pricing as the most cost-effective tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Empirical studies show that carbon pricing can successfully incentivise incremental emissions reductions. But meeting temperature targets within defined timelines as agreed under the Paris Agreement requires more than incremental improvements: it requires achieving net zero emissions within a few decades. To date, there is little evidence that carbon pricing has produced deep emission reductions, even at high prices. While much steeper carbon prices may deliver greater abatement, political economy constraints render their feasibility doubtful. An approach with multiple instruments, including technology mandates and targeted support for innovation, is indispensable to avoid path dependencies and lock-in of long-lived, high-carbon assets. We argue that carbon pricing serves several important purposes in such an instrument mix, but also that the global commitment to deep decarbonisation requires acknowledging the vital role of instruments other than carbon pricing.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 189
页数:5
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [31] British Columbia's revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest "grand experiment" in environmental policy
    Murray, Brian
    Rivers, Nicholas
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 86 : 674 - 683
  • [32] Revisiting the social cost of carbon
    Nordhaus, William D.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (07) : 1518 - 1523
  • [33] Olson M., 1971, LOGIC COLLECTIVE ACT, DOI 10.4159/9780674041660
  • [34] Pahle M., 2017, Resources For the Future
  • [35] The '2°C capital stock' for electricity generation: Committed cumulative carbon emissions from the electricity generation sector and the transition to a green economy
    Pfeiffer, Alexander
    Millar, Richard
    Hepburn, Cameron
    Beinhocker, Eric
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 179 : 1395 - 1408
  • [36] Powering Past Coal Alliance, 2017, DECLARATION
  • [37] A Tale of Two Climate Policies: Political Economy of British Columbia's Carbon Tax and Clean Electricity Standard
    Rhodes, Ekaterina
    Jaccard, Mark
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2013, 39 : S37 - S51
  • [38] Sanchez-Pacheco A., 2009, Endocrinology, V150, P5143, DOI [DOI 10.1210/EN.2009-0117, 10.1210/en.2009-0117, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH]
  • [39] Lessons Learned from Three Decades of Experience with Cap and Trade
    Schmalensee, Richard
    Stavins, Robert N.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2017, 11 (01) : 59 - 79
  • [40] Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications
    Seto, Karen C.
    Davis, Steven J.
    Mitchell, Ronald B.
    Stokes, Eleanor C.
    Unruh, Gregory
    Urge-Vorsatz, Diana
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 41, 2016, 41 : 425 - 452