Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation

被引:141
作者
Tvinnereim, Endre [1 ]
Mehling, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Uni Res Rokkan Ctr, POB 7810, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[2] MIT, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Global warming; Climate change; Emissions; Carbon prices; Mitigation; TECHNOLOGY POLICIES; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; CLIMATE; EMISSIONS; INSTRUMENT; INNOVATION; TARGETS; TAXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.020
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Experts frequently point to carbon pricing as the most cost-effective tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Empirical studies show that carbon pricing can successfully incentivise incremental emissions reductions. But meeting temperature targets within defined timelines as agreed under the Paris Agreement requires more than incremental improvements: it requires achieving net zero emissions within a few decades. To date, there is little evidence that carbon pricing has produced deep emission reductions, even at high prices. While much steeper carbon prices may deliver greater abatement, political economy constraints render their feasibility doubtful. An approach with multiple instruments, including technology mandates and targeted support for innovation, is indispensable to avoid path dependencies and lock-in of long-lived, high-carbon assets. We argue that carbon pricing serves several important purposes in such an instrument mix, but also that the global commitment to deep decarbonisation requires acknowledging the vital role of instruments other than carbon pricing.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 189
页数:5
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [21] Jenkins J.D., 2016, CARBON PRICING BINDI
  • [22] Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies: What are the implications for economic efficiency, environmental efficacy, and climate policy design?
    Jenkins, Jesse D.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 69 : 467 - 477
  • [23] Public willingness to pay for a US carbon tax and preferences for spending the revenue
    Kotchen, Matthew J.
    Turk, Zachary M.
    Leiserowitz, Anthony A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [24] Does the American Public Support Legislation to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
    Krosnick, Jon A.
    MacInnis, Bo
    [J]. DAEDALUS, 2013, 142 (01) : 26 - 39
  • [25] Labandeira X, 2011, HANDBOOK OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, P441
  • [26] Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO), 2017, 2017 18 BUDG CAP TRA
  • [27] The Impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on Regulated Firms: What Is the Evidence after Ten Years?
    Martin, Ralf
    Muuls, Mirabelle
    Wagner, Ulrich J.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2016, 10 (01) : 129 - 148
  • [28] Winning coalitions for climate policy
    Meckling, Jonas
    Kelsey, Nina
    Biber, Eric
    Zysman, John
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6253) : 1170 - 1171
  • [29] Mehling M., 2018, Carbon Clim. Law Rev, V12, P50, DOI [10.21552/cclr/2018/1/9, DOI 10.21552/CCLR/2018/1/9]
  • [30] Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C
    Meinshausen, Malte
    Meinshausen, Nicolai
    Hare, William
    Raper, Sarah C. B.
    Frieler, Katja
    Knutti, Reto
    Frame, David J.
    Allen, Myles R.
    [J]. NATURE, 2009, 458 (7242) : 1158 - U96