Channel Choice, Justification of Deception, and Detection

被引:7
|
作者
Van Swol, Lyn M. [1 ]
Braun, Michael T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Commun Arts, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Millikin Univ, Dept Commun, Decatur, IL 62522 USA
关键词
Deception; Lies; Omission; Detection; Demeanor; Nonverbal Cues; INFORMATION; INDICATORS; PREVALENCE; FAIRNESS;
D O I
10.1111/jcom.12125
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Using Truth Default Theory, we assess whether senders choose to communicate through anonymous text chat or face-to-face when they deceive, and differences in receiver ability to detect deception in the 2 channels. Participants were randomly assigned as distributor or receiver in an ultimatum game. Distributors received $8 to divide between self and receiver. Receivers did not know the amount distributors had received, so distributors could deceive. Distributors used text chat more for deceptive offers; receivers were more accurate at detecting deception through text chat than face-to-face. When part of the distributor's allocation appeared to be won through luck, distributors were more deceptive. Distributors with more dishonest demeanors increased suspicion, but demeanor was not significantly related to detection accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1159
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Truth-Default Theory (TDT): A Theory of Human Deception and Deception Detection
    Levine, Timothy R.
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 33 (04) : 378 - 392
  • [42] Unexpected questions in deception detection interviews: Does question order matter?
    Warmelink, Lara
    Subramanian, Anna
    Tkacheva, Daria
    McLatchie, Neil
    LEGAL AND CRIMINOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 24 (02) : 258 - 272
  • [43] Deception choice and self-selection - The importance of being earnest
    Konrad, Kai A.
    Lohse, Tim
    Qari, Salmai
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2014, 107 : 25 - 39
  • [44] Deception and Decay: Verbal Lie Detection as a Function of Delay and Encoding Quality
    Harvey, Adam Charles
    Vrij, Aldert
    Leal, Sharron
    Hope, Lorraine
    Mann, Samantha
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2017, 6 (03) : 306 - 318
  • [45] Detection of Deception in the Mafia Party Game
    Demyanov, Sergey
    Bailey, James
    Ramamohanarao, Kotagiri
    Leckie, Christopher
    ICMI'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION, 2015, : 335 - 342
  • [46] No evidence that instructions to ignore nonverbal cues improve deception detection accuracy
    Bogaard, Glynis
    Meijer, Ewout H.
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 36 (03) : 636 - 647
  • [47] Examining Sender and Judge Variability in Honesty Assessments and Deception Detection Accuracy: Evidence for a Transparent Liar but No Evidence of Deception-General Ability
    Levine, Timothy R.
    COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2016, 33 (03) : 188 - 194
  • [48] Vulnerabilities to Online Social Network Identity Deception Detection Research and Recommendations for Mitigation
    Ismailov, Max
    Tsikerdekis, Michail
    Zeadally, Sherali
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2020, 12 (09): : 1 - 12
  • [49] HABITUATION OF PUPIL RESPONSES IN OCULOMOTOR DETECTION OF DECEPTION
    Kuhlman, Brian B.
    Webb, Andrea K.
    Patnaik, Pooja
    Cook, Anne E.
    Woltz, Dan J.
    Hacker, Doug J.
    Kircher, John C.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 : S63 - S63
  • [50] Content in Context Improves Deception Detection Accuracy
    Blair, J. Pete
    Levine, Timothy R.
    Shaw, Allison S.
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2010, 36 (03) : 423 - 442