Channel Choice, Justification of Deception, and Detection

被引:7
|
作者
Van Swol, Lyn M. [1 ]
Braun, Michael T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Commun Arts, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Millikin Univ, Dept Commun, Decatur, IL 62522 USA
关键词
Deception; Lies; Omission; Detection; Demeanor; Nonverbal Cues; INFORMATION; INDICATORS; PREVALENCE; FAIRNESS;
D O I
10.1111/jcom.12125
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Using Truth Default Theory, we assess whether senders choose to communicate through anonymous text chat or face-to-face when they deceive, and differences in receiver ability to detect deception in the 2 channels. Participants were randomly assigned as distributor or receiver in an ultimatum game. Distributors received $8 to divide between self and receiver. Receivers did not know the amount distributors had received, so distributors could deceive. Distributors used text chat more for deceptive offers; receivers were more accurate at detecting deception through text chat than face-to-face. When part of the distributor's allocation appeared to be won through luck, distributors were more deceptive. Distributors with more dishonest demeanors increased suspicion, but demeanor was not significantly related to detection accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1159
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Limits of Conscious Deception Detection: When Reliance on False Deception Cues Contributes to Inaccurate Judgments
    Stel, Marielle
    Schwarz, Annika
    van Dijk, Eric
    van Knippenberg, Ad
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [22] Deception Detection and Truth Detection Are Dependent on Different Cognitive and Emotional Traits: An Investigation of Emotional Intelligence, Theory of Mind, and Attention
    Stewart, Suzanne L. K.
    Wright, Clea
    Atherton, Catherine
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2019, 45 (05) : 794 - 807
  • [23] COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IN NEGOTIATION: FREE CHOICE OR JUSTIFICATION?
    Bendersky, Corinne
    Curhan, Jared R.
    SOCIAL COGNITION, 2009, 27 (03) : 455 - 474
  • [24] "You can't kid a kidder": association between production and detection of deception in an interactive deception task
    Wright, Gordon R. T.
    Berry, Christopher J.
    Bird, Geoffrey
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [25] Masking the truth: the impact of face masks on deception detection
    Cash, Daniella K.
    Pazos, Laura A.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 164 (05) : 840 - 853
  • [26] The Viability of Using Rapid Judgments as a Method of Deception Detection
    Dunbar, Norah E.
    Jensen, Matthew L.
    Harvell-Bowman, Lindsey A.
    Kelley, Katherine M.
    Burgoon, Judee K.
    COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 2017, 11 (02) : 121 - 136
  • [27] Evaluation of the effectiveness of a brief deception detection training program
    Porter, Stephen
    Juodis, Marcus
    ten Brinke, Leanne M.
    Klein, Raymond
    Wilson, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) : 66 - 76
  • [28] Deception and Fraud in the Justification of "Pediatric Drug Development": A Challenge at the Interface of Medicine and Law
    Rose, Klaus
    Grant-Kels, Jane M.
    Striano, Pasquale
    Russo, Emilio
    Ettienne, Earl B.
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2024, 31 (03)
  • [29] Bending Our Ethics Code Avoidable Deception and Its Justification in Psychological Research
    Hilbig, Benjamin E.
    Thielmann, Isabel
    Boehm, Robert
    EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2022, 27 (01) : 62 - 70
  • [30] Sender credibility and deception detection
    George, Joey F.
    Tilley, Patti
    Giordano, Gabriel
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 : 1 - 11