Determining life-stage groups and extrapolating nutrient intake values (NIVs)

被引:38
作者
Atkinson, Stephanie A.
Koletzko, Berthold
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Pediat, Hamilton, ON LL8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] Univ Munich, Dr Von Hauner Childrens Hosp, Div Metab Dis & Nutr Med, Munich, Germany
关键词
extrapolation; interpolation; lactation; milk composition; nutrient intake values; pregnancy; recommended nutrient intakes; reference body weights and heights;
D O I
10.1177/15648265070281S107
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The derivation of reference values in 11 current dietary reference standards is often based on methods of extrapolation or interpolation, but these are not consistent across reports. Such methods are frequently employed to derive nutrient intake values (NIVs) for infants and children owing to the paucity of relevant research data available. The most common method is to extrapolate values for children down from those of adults, employing a weight or metabolic factor and adjusting for growth. In some instances, values for young children are extrapolated up from infants, values for adults are extrapolated up from children, or values for older adults are extrapolated up from young adults. Extrapolation is employed to estimate not only nutrient requirement or adequate intake but also the upper tolerable levels of intake. Extrapolation methods may also form the basis of estimates of tissue deposition of nutrients during growth in children and for the maternal/fetal dyad in pregnancy with adjustments for metabolic efficiency. Likewise, recommended intakes during lactation are extrapolated from known secretion of the nutrient in milk with adjustments for bioavailability. For future dietary standards, a first priority is to obtain relevant scientific data using current methodology, such as stable isotope tracers, body composition analysis, and appropriate biomarkers, from which NIVs for each age group can be derived. Extrapolation to derive an NIV is only acceptable in the sheer absence of sound scientific data and must be modeled with a consistent approach. For the purpose of harmonization of dietary standards, we recommend the following approaches that should be clearly described in reports: standardization of age groups on a biological basis (growth and pubertal stages) with consideration of relevant developmental milestones throughout childhood; application of internationally accepted standards for growth, body size, body composition, fetal and maternal nutrient accretion in pregnancy, and milk composition; and inclusion of appropriate adjustments (metabolic efficiency, weight change, or physical activity).
引用
收藏
页码:S61 / S76
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Recommended dietary allowances (RDAs), recommended dietary intakes (RDIs), recommended nutrient intakes (RNIs), and population reference intakes (PRIs) are not ''recommended intakes''
    Aggett, PJ
    Bresson, J
    Haschke, F
    Hernell, O
    Koletzko, B
    Lafeber, HN
    Michaelsen, KF
    Micheli, J
    Ormisson, A
    Rey, J
    deSousa, JS
    Weaver, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1997, 25 (02) : 236 - 241
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, RECOMENDACIONES INGE
  • [4] INCREMENTAL GROWTH TABLES - SUPPLEMENTARY TO PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED CHARTS
    BAUMGARTNER, RN
    ROCHE, AF
    HIMES, JH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1986, 43 (05) : 711 - 722
  • [5] Body composition during the first 2 years of life: An updated reference
    Butte, NF
    Hopkinson, JM
    Wong, WW
    Smith, EO
    Ellis, KJ
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 47 (05) : 578 - 585
  • [6] Butte NF, 2000, AM J CLIN NUTR, V72, P1558
  • [7] *COMM EXP GROUP CA, 1994, RECOMMENDED DIETARY
  • [8] Ellis KJ, 2000, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V904, P374
  • [9] *EUR COMM HLTH CON, 2003, 137 SCFCSPLENMINS
  • [10] BODY-COMPOSITION OF REFERENCE CHILDREN FROM BIRTH TO AGE 10 YEARS
    FOMON, SJ
    HASCHKE, F
    ZIEGLER, EE
    NELSON, SE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1982, 35 (05) : 1169 - 1175