Training cognitive skills in virtual reality: Measuring performance

被引:19
作者
Tichon, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Percept & Motor Syst Lab, Sch Human Movement Studies, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR | 2007年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/cpb.2006.9957
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Across a variety of operational environments, virtual reality (VR) is being increasingly used as a means of simulating hazardous work conditions in order to allow trainees to practice advanced cognitive skills such as problem-solving and decision-making. Replicating dangerous conditions particularly involving heavy machinery in the real world can be dangerous and costly. The use of VR is therefore appealing across many industries such as aviation, mining, and rail. However, while the number of training prototypes increase less focus is being given to appropriate evaluation of the training provided via this technology. Increasing skills acquisition and performance does not depend solely on the appropriate design of simulation training. Of equal importance are strong performance measures which can ultimately feedback on the success or otherwise of training and highlight any deficits to guide ongoing improvements. To ensure cognitive skills acquired in a virtual training environment (VTE) are transferable to the real world, training objectives need to be tied directly to realistic scenario events which in turn are directly linked to measures of specific required behaviors.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 289
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, MEDICAL TEAMWORK PAT
  • [2] ATKINS RJ, 2005, P SIMT 2005 SUCC VIS
  • [3] Developing competency-based methods for near-real-time air combat problem solving assessment
    Bennett, W
    Schreiber, BT
    Andrews, DH
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2002, 18 (06) : 773 - 782
  • [4] BIOCCA F, 2005, COMMUNICATION AGE VI, P57
  • [5] Cannon-Bowers J.A., 1998, MAKING DECISIONS STR, P365
  • [6] Driskell J.E., 1998, Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training, P191, DOI DOI 10.1037/10278-007
  • [7] Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: A case study in the methodology of cognitive task analysis
    Hoffman, RR
    Crandall, B
    Shadbolt, N
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 1998, 40 (02) : 254 - 276
  • [8] KYLLONEN PC, 2000, TRAINING RETRAINING, P171
  • [9] Lombard Matthew., 1997, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V3, pJCMC321, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.1997.TB00072.X, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x]
  • [10] MORRISON JG, 2007, P 3 INT COMM CONTROL