Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review

被引:4363
作者
Balouiri, Mounyr [1 ]
Sadiki, Moulay [1 ]
Koraichi Ibnsouda, Saad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fac Sci & Tech, Lab Microbial Biotechnol, BP 2202 Imouzzer Rd, Fes, Morocco
关键词
Agar diffusion method; Antimicrobial gradient method; Thin-layer chromatography (TLC)-bioautography; Time-kill test;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in researching and developing new antimicrobial agents from various sources to combat microbial resistance. Therefore, a greater attention has been paid to antimicrobial activity screening and evaluating methods. Several bioassays such as disk-diffusion, well diffusion and broth or agar dilution are well known and commonly used, but others such as flow cytofluorometric and bioluminescent methods are not widely used because they require specified equipment and further evaluation for reproducibility and standardization, even if they can provide rapid results of the antimicrobial agent's effects and a better understanding of their impact on the viability and cell damage inflicted to the tested microorganism. In this review article, an exhaustive list of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and detailed information on their advantages and limitations are reported. (C) 2015 Xi'an Jiaotong University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 101 条
[71]  
Arikan S., Current status of antifungal susceptibility testing methods, Med. Mycol., 45, pp. 569-587, (2007)
[72]  
Lass-Florl C., Cuenca-Estrella M., Denning D.W., Et al., Antifungal susceptibility testing in Aspergillus spp. according to EUCAST methodology, Med. Mycol., 44, pp. 319-325, (2006)
[73]  
Petrikkou E., Rodri J.L., Gomez A., Et al., Inoculum standardization for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi pathogenic for humans, J. Clin. Microbiol., 39, pp. 1345-1347, (2001)
[74]  
Aberkane A., Cuenca-Estrella M., Gomez-Lopez A., Et al., Comparative evaluation of two different methods of inoculum preparation for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 50, pp. 719-722, (2002)
[75]  
CLSI, Methods for Determining Bactericidal Activity of Antimicrobial Agents. Approved Guideline, CLSI Document M26-A, (1998)
[76]  
Canton E., Peman J., Viudes A., Et al., Minimum fungicidal concentrations of amphotericin B for bloodstream Candida species, Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 45, pp. 203-206, (2003)
[77]  
Espinel-Ingroff A., Fothergill A., Peter J., Et al., Testing conditions for determination of minimum fungicidal concentrations of new and established antifungal agents for Aspergillus spp.: NCCLS collaborative study, J. Clin. Microbiol., 40, pp. 3204-3208, (2002)
[78]  
Espinel-Ingroff A., Chaturvedi V., Fothergill A., Et al., Optimal testing conditions for determining MICs and minimum fungicidal concentrations of new and established antifungal agents for uncommon molds: NCCLS collaborative study, J. Clin. Microbiol., 40, pp. 3776-3781, (2002)
[79]  
CLSI, Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria, Approved Guideline, CLSI Document M45-A2, (2010)
[80]  
Menon T., Umamaheswari K., Kumarasamy N., Et al., Efficacy of fluconazole and itraconazole in the treatment of oral candidiasis in HIV patients, Acta Trop., 80, pp. 151-154, (2001)