Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy

被引:10
作者
Scott, Melissa [1 ]
Sander, Robert [2 ]
Nemet, Gregory [3 ]
Patz, Jonathan [4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Duke Samuel DuBois Cook Ctr Social Equ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal IIASA, Air Qual & Greenhouse Gases Program, Laxenburg, Austria
[3] Univ Wisconsin, La Follette Sch Publ Affairs, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Global Hlth Inst, Madison, WI USA
关键词
air pollution; coal-fired power plants; renewable energy; China; human health; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; AIR-POLLUTION; PREMATURE MORTALITY; PARTICULATE MATTER; CLIMATE-CHANGE; METHANE EMISSIONS; CHILDRENS HEALTH; SULFUR-DIOXIDE; QUALITY; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.613517
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In this study, we estimate the health benefits of more stringent alternative energy goals and the costs of reducing coal-fired power plant pollution in China projected in 2030. One of our two overarching alternative energy goals was to estimate the health benefits of complete elimination of coal energy, supplemented by natural gas and renewables. The second was a policy scenario similar to the U.S. 2013 Climate Action Plan (CAP), which played a pivotal role leading up to the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. We used the Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model created by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis for our model simulations. We found that 17,137-24,220 premature deaths can be avoided if coal energy is completely replaced by alternative energy, and 8,693-9,281 premature deaths can be avoided if coal energy is replaced by alternatives in a CAP-like scenario. A CAP-like scenario using emission-controls in coal plants costs $11-18 per person. Reducing coal energy in China under a CAP-like scenario would free up $9.4 billion in the annual energy budget to spend on alternatives, whereas eliminating the cost of coal energy frees up $32 billion. This study's estimates show that more stringent alternative energy targets in China are worth the investment in terms of health.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [51] The White House, 2015, WHIT HOUS CLEAN POW
  • [52] U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2020, MUCH CARB DIOX IS PR
  • [53] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009, INT SCI ASS ISA PART
  • [54] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2016, SOC COST CARB
  • [55] Particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and daily mortality in Chongqing, China
    Venners, SA
    Wang, BY
    Peng, ZG
    Xu, Y
    Wang, LH
    Xu, XP
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 111 (04) : 562 - 567
  • [56] Wagner F., 2008, FINAL REPORT POLICY
  • [57] Analysis of residents' willingness to pay to reduce air pollution to improve children's health in community and hospital settings in Shanghai, China
    Wang, Keran
    Wu, Jinyi
    Wang, Rui
    Yang, Yingying
    Chen, Renjie
    Maddock, Jay E.
    Lu, Yuanan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 533 : 283 - 289
  • [58] Evaluating impacts of air pollution in China on public health: Implications for future air pollution and energy policies
    Wang, XP
    Mauzerall, DL
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (09) : 1706 - 1721
  • [59] West JJ, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P885, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2009, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2009]
  • [60] WHO . World Health Statistics, 2020, WORLD HLTH STAT 2020