A multicentre randomised trial to compare the efficacy of omeprazole versus rabeprazole in early symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis

被引:11
|
作者
Nagahara, Akihito [1 ]
Suzuki, Tsuyoshi [2 ]
Nagata, Naoyoshi [3 ]
Sugai, Nozomu [4 ]
Takeuchi, Yoshiaki [5 ]
Sakurai, Kouichi [6 ]
Miyamoto, Masaki
Inoue, Kazuhiko
Akiyama, Junichi [3 ]
Mabe, Katsuhiro
Konuma, Ichiro
Kamada, Tomoari
Haruma, Ken
机构
[1] Juntendo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Tokyo 113, Japan
[2] Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] KKR Sapporo Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[5] Showa Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Tokyo 142, Japan
[6] Kumamoto Univ, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Kumamoto, Japan
关键词
Omeprazole; Rabeprazole; Proton pump inhibitor; Reflux esophagitis; Symptom relief; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GENERAL-POPULATION; INTRAGASTRIC PH; DISEASE; LANSOPRAZOLE; ESOMEPRAZOLE; DYSPEPSIA; GERD;
D O I
10.1007/s00535-013-0925-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are affected by cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) polymorphisms. This study compared the effect of two PPIs on early symptom relief in Japanese patients with reflux esophagitis, classified by the CYP2C19 phenotype. Patients with reflux esophagitis were randomised to treatment with omeprazole 20 mg or rabeprazole 10 mg once daily. The CYP2C19 phenotype [homozygous extensive metaboliser (homoEM), heterozygous extensive metaboliser (heteroEM) or poor metaboliser (PM)] of each patient was determined. The primary efficacy endpoint was early, sufficient (Global Overall Symptom scale score 1 or 2), sustained (maintained for a parts per thousand yen7 days) reflux symptom relief. Of the 199 patients included in this analysis, the proportion achieving sufficient, sustained reflux symptom relief was higher with omeprazole than with rabeprazole on day 1 (35.6 vs. 22.4 %; p = 0.041) and day 2 (43.6 vs. 28.6 %; p = 0.028); there was no significant difference between the two groups on days 3-7. Among patients with the CYP2C19 PM phenotype, sufficient, sustained reflux symptom relief was higher with omeprazole than with rabeprazole on days 4-7 (62.5-66.9 vs 31.6 %; p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.03); differences were not significant on days 1-3, or among those with the homoEM or heteroEM phenotypes on days 1-7. In Japanese patients with reflux esophagitis, omeprazole 20 mg is more effective than rabeprazole 10 mg at achieving early, sufficient, sustained reflux symptom relief in individuals with the CYP2C19 PM phenotype, and is similarly effective to rabeprazole 10 mg in those with heteroEM or homoEM phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:1536 / 1547
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multicentre randomised trial to compare the efficacy of omeprazole versus rabeprazole in early symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis
    Akihito Nagahara
    Tsuyoshi Suzuki
    Naoyoshi Nagata
    Nozomu Sugai
    Yoshiaki Takeuchi
    Kouichi Sakurai
    Masaki Miyamoto
    Kazuhiko Inoue
    Junichi Akiyama
    Katsuhiro Mabe
    Ichiro Konuma
    Tomoari Kamada
    Ken Haruma
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 49 : 1536 - 1547
  • [2] A Multicenter Randomized Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Omeprazole Versus Rabeprazole on Early Symptom Relief in Reflux Esophagitis
    Nagahara, Akihito
    Suzuki, Tsuyoshi
    Nagata, Naoyoshi
    Sugai, Nozomu
    Takeuchi, Yoshiaki
    Sakurai, Kouichi
    Miyamoto, Masaki
    Inoue, Kazuhiko
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S588 - S588
  • [3] Symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis: Comparative study of omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole
    Adachi, K
    Hashimoto, T
    Hamamoto, N
    Hirakawa, K
    Niigaki, M
    Miyake, T
    Taniura, H
    Ono, M
    Kaji, T
    Suetsugu, H
    Yagi, J
    Komazawa, Y
    Mihara, T
    Katsube, T
    Fujishiro, H
    Shizuku, T
    Hattori, S
    Yamamoto, S
    Kinoshita, Y
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 18 (12) : 1392 - 1398
  • [4] Comparative study of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and esomeprazole for symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis
    Zheng, Ri-Nan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 15 (08) : 990 - 995
  • [5] Comparative study of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and esomeprazole for symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis
    Ri-Nan Zheng
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009, 15 (08) : 990 - 995
  • [6] LANSOPRAZOLE PROVIDES GREATER SYMPTOM RELIEF THAN OMEPRAZOLE, IN REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS
    MEE, AS
    ROWLEY, JL
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (04) : A164 - A164
  • [7] OMEPRAZOLE PROVIDES FASTER HEALING AND SYMPTOM RELIEF OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS THAN CIMETIDINE
    BATE, CM
    KEELING, PWN
    OMORAIN, CA
    WILKINSON, SP
    MOUNTFORD, RA
    TEMPERLEY, JM
    FOSTER, DN
    HARVEY, RF
    THOMPSON, DG
    FORGACS, IC
    BASSETT, KS
    RICHARDSON, PDI
    GUT, 1989, 30 (10) : A1493 - A1494
  • [8] Rabeprazole (RAB) provides a faster and more sustained reflux symptom relief than omeprazole (OME) in oesophagitis patients
    Pace, F
    Annese, V
    Prada, A
    Zambelli, A
    Casalini, S
    Nardini, P
    Porro, GB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (10): : S294 - S294
  • [9] A comparative study of vonoprazan and esomeprazole for early symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis
    Masuda, Tsutomu
    Inatsugi, Naoki
    Yoshikawa, Syusaku
    Seiji, Terauchi
    Uchida, Hideki
    Nakao, Takeshi
    Yamaoka, Kentarou
    Inagaki, Mizumi
    Yokoo, Takashi
    Saraya, Tsutomu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 : 86 - 86
  • [10] Symptom diversity of patients with reflux esophagitis: Effect of omeprazole treatment
    Adachi, Kyoichi
    Matsumori, Yoshinobu
    Fujisawa, Tomoo
    Kamada, Tomoari
    Kusaka, Masayasu
    Ohumi, Tsuneyo
    Iwakiri, Ryuichi
    Yamaguchi, Kanako
    Danjo, Akiko
    Hori, Kazutoshi
    Tomita, Toshihiko
    Hayashi, Takamasa
    Haruma, Ken
    Fujimoto, Kazuma
    Miwa, Hiroto
    Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY AND NUTRITION, 2006, 39 (01) : 46 - 54