Diffusion-weighted Imaging Allows for Downgrading MR BI-RADS 4 Lesions in Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast to Avoid Unnecessary Biopsy

被引:64
作者
Clauser, Paola [1 ]
Krug, Barbara [2 ]
Bickel, Hubert [1 ]
Dietzel, Matthias [3 ]
Pinker, Katja [4 ]
Neuhaus, Victor-Frederic [2 ]
Marino, Maria Adele [5 ]
Moschetta, Marco [6 ]
Troiano, Nicoletta [6 ]
Helbich, Thomas H. [1 ]
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Biomed Imaging & Image Guided Therapy, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Cologne, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ, Dept Radiol, Hosp Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Serv, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Messina, Policlin Univ G Martino, Dept Biomed Sci & Morphol & Funct Imaging, Messina, Italy
[6] Univ Bari, DETO Breast Care Unit, Med Sch, Bari, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3037
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Diffusion-weighted imaging with the calculation of an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been proposed as a quantitative biomarker on contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) of the breast. There is a need to approve a generalizable ADC cutoff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a predefined ADC cutoff allows downgrading of BI-RADS 4 lesions on CE-MRI, avoiding unnecessary biopsies. Experimental Design: This was a retrospective, multicentric, cross-sectional study. Data from five centers were pooled on the individual lesion level. Eligible patients had a BI-RADS 4 rating on CE-MRI. For each center, two breast radiologists evaluated the images. Data on lesion morphology (mass, non-mass), size, and ADC were collected. Histology was the standard of reference. A previously suggested ADC cutoff (>= 1.5 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second) was applied. A negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 or lower was considered as a rule-out criterion for breast cancer. Diagnostic performance indices were calculated by ROC analysis. Results: There were 657 female patients (mean age, 42; SD, 14.1) with 696 BI-RADS 4 lesions included. Disease prevalence was 59.5% (414/696). The area under the ROC curve was 0.784. Applying the investigated ADC cutoff, sensitivity was 96.6% (400/414). The potential reduction of unnecessary biopsies was 32.6% (92/282). Conclusions: An ADC cutoff of >= 1.5 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second allows downgrading of lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast CE-MRI. One-third of unnecessary biopsies could thus be avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:1941 / 1948
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Can breast MRI accurately exclude malignancy in mammographic architectural distortion? [J].
Amitai, Yoav ;
Scaranelo, Anabel ;
Menes, Tehillah S. ;
Fleming, Rachel ;
Kulkarni, Supriya ;
Ghai, Sandeep ;
Freitas, Vivianne .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (05) :2751-2760
[2]   Limited role of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [J].
Avendano, Daly ;
Marino, Maria Adele ;
Leithner, Doris ;
Thakur, Sunitha ;
Bernard-Davila, Blanca ;
Martinez, Danny F. ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. ;
Jochelson, Maxine S. ;
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Clauser, Paola ;
Kapetas, Panagiotis ;
Pinker, Katja .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (01)
[3]   Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue [J].
Bakker, Marije F. ;
de Lange, Stephanie V. ;
Pijnappel, Ruud M. ;
Mann, Ritse M. ;
Peeters, Petra H. M. ;
Monninkhof, Evelyn M. ;
Emaus, Marleen J. ;
Loo, Claudette E. ;
Bisschops, Robertus H. C. ;
Lobbes, Marc B. I. ;
de Jong, Matthijn D. F. ;
Duvivier, Katya M. ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
de Koning, Harry J. ;
van Diest, Paul J. ;
Mali, Willem P. T. M. ;
van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J. ;
Veldhuis, Wouter B. ;
van Gils, Carla H. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (22) :2091-2102
[4]   Combined reading of Contrast Enhanced and Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging by using a simple sum score [J].
Baltzer, Anja ;
Dietzel, Matthias ;
Kaiser, Clemens G. ;
Baltzer, Pascal A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (03) :884-891
[5]   Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group [J].
Baltzer, Pascal ;
Mann, Ritse M. ;
Iima, Mami ;
Sigmund, Eric E. ;
Clauser, Paola ;
Gilbert, Fiona J. ;
Martincich, Laura ;
Partridge, Savannah C. ;
Patterson, Andrew ;
Pinker, Katja ;
Thibault, Fabienne ;
Camps-Herrero, Julia ;
Le Bihan, Denis .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) :1436-1450
[6]   Potential of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Characterization of Breast Lesions Intraindividual Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Bickel, Hubert ;
Spick, Claudio ;
Wengert, Georg ;
Woitek, Ramona ;
Kapetas, Panagiotis ;
Clauser, Paola ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Pinker, Katja .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) :229-235
[7]   Lesion type and reader experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI: A multiple reader ROC study [J].
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Kaiser, Werner Alois ;
Dietzel, Matthias .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (01) :86-91
[8]   False-Positive Findings at Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A BI-RADS Descriptor Study [J].
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Benndorf, Matthias ;
Dietzel, Matthias ;
Gajda, Mieczyslaw ;
Runnebaum, Ingo B. ;
Kaiser, Werner A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (06) :1658-1663
[9]   Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Bennani-Baiti, Barbara ;
Bennani-Baiti, Nabila ;
Baltzer, Pascal A. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08)
[10]  
Bickel H, 2015, INVEST RADIOL, V50, P95, DOI 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000104