Effects of crop load and rootstock on fruit quality in 'Suncrest' peach cultivar

被引:2
|
作者
De Salvador, F. R. [1 ]
Giovannini, D. [2 ]
Liverani, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ist Sperimentale Fruiticulture, Rome, Italy
[2] Ist Sperimentale Fruiticulture, Forli, Italy
关键词
P; persica; thinning; graft-combination; fruit weight; soluble solids;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.732.41
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The project was set up in 2003 to investigate the effects of crop load and rootstock on fruit quality and tree yield in peach. The study was carried out in two areas of Italy (southeast Po valley, lat. 44.3 degrees N - 12.07 degrees E, 34 m a.s.l; Rome, 41.6 degrees N 12.4 degrees E, 20 m a.s.1), on mature 'Suncrest' trees grafted onto rootstocks of different vigour: GF677 (P. persica x P. amygdalus), Barrier1 (P. persica x P. davidiana), PSA5 (P. persica), Ishtara ((P. cerasifera x P. salicina) x (P. persica x P. cerasifera)). Three different crop loads (CL), i.e., number of fruits/trunk cross-section area (TCSA), were applied to each graft-combination: a standard crop load (SCL=1.5 fruit/cm(2) of TCSA); a light crop load (LCL=1.0 fruit/cm(2) of TCSA) and a heavy crop load (HCL=2.0 fruit/cm(2) of TCSA). For all graft combinations, higher CL caused significant yield/tree increases and fruit-weight reductions. However, Barrierl and GF677 were more sensitive than Ishtara and PSA5 to fruit load and, for the same CL, produced smaller fruits. GF677 and Barrierl significantly delayed harvest date, while Ishtara advanced it. Increasing CL from 1.0 to 2.0 negatively affected fruit soluble sugars and titratable acidity on trees grafted onto Barrier1 and PSA5.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The rootstock effects on plant adaptability, production, fruit quality, and nutrition in the peach (cv. 'Suncrest')
    Giorgi, M
    Capocasa, F
    Scalzo, J
    Murri, G
    Battino, M
    Mezzetti, B
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2005, 107 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [2] The Effect of Rootstock on Agronomical Performance and Fruit Quality of 'Elegant Lady®' Peach Cultivar
    Iglesias, I.
    Carbo, J.
    Bonany, J.
    VII INTERNATIONAL PEACH SYMPOSIUM, 2012, 962 : 613 - 619
  • [3] Effects of crop load on fruit water relations and fruit growth in peach
    McFadyen, LM
    Hutton, RJ
    Barlow, EWR
    JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1996, 71 (03): : 469 - 480
  • [4] Effects of water stress and rootstocks on fruit phenolic composition and physical/chemical quality in Suncrest peach
    Tavarini, S.
    Gil, M. I.
    Tomas-Barberan, F. A.
    Buendia, B.
    Remorini, D.
    Massai, R.
    Degl'Innocenti, E.
    Guidi, L.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 2011, 158 (02) : 226 - 233
  • [5] Rootstock effects on the growth and fruit yield of peach
    Bussi, C
    Huguet, JG
    Besset, J
    Girard, T
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1995, 4 (03) : 387 - 393
  • [6] Effects of fruit load on photosynthetic characteristics of peach leaves and fruit quality
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Zhang, Binbin
    Guo, Shaolei
    Guo, Lei
    Chen, Xingxing
    He, Xin
    Ma, Ruijuan
    Yu, Mingliang
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2022, 299
  • [7] Combined effects of irrigation, crop load and fruit position on size, color and firmness of fruits in an extra-early cultivar of peach
    Alcobendas, Rosalia
    Miras-Avalos, Jose M.
    Jose Alarcon, Juan
    Pedrero, Francisco
    Nicolas, Emilio
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2012, 142 : 128 - 135
  • [8] Peach cell number and size is affected by crop load and cultivar
    Reighard, G. L.
    Souza, F. B. M.
    Pio, R.
    X INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MODELLING IN FRUIT RESEARCH AND ORCHARD MANAGEMENT, 2017, 1160 : 357 - 359
  • [9] Effect of fruit crop load on peach root growth
    Ben Mimoun, M.
    DeJong, T. M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE VITH INTERNATIONAL PEACH SYMPOSIUM, 2006, (713): : 169 - +
  • [10] Effects of crop load and time of thinning on the incidence of split pits, fruit yield, fruit quality, and leaf mineral contents in 'Andross' peach
    Drogoudi, P. D.
    Tsipouridis, C. G.
    Pantelidis, G.
    JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 84 (05): : 505 - 509