Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial

被引:12
作者
Castillo, Gisell [1 ,2 ]
Lalu, Manoj M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Asad, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Foster, Madison [1 ,2 ]
Kekre, Natasha [2 ,4 ]
Fergusson, Dean A. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Hawrysh, Terry [6 ]
Atkins, Harold [2 ,4 ]
Thavorn, Kednapa [2 ,5 ,7 ]
Montroy, Joshua [1 ,2 ]
Schwartz, Stuart [6 ]
Holt, Robert A. [8 ]
Broady, Raewyn [9 ]
Presseau, Justin [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Blueprint Translat Res Grp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Med, Gen Campus, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Ottawa Hosp, Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, Gen Campus, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Patient Partner, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] ICES Univ Ottawa, Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] BC Canc, Genome Sci Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[9] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Leukemia BMT Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
haematology; immunology; oncology; qualitative research; clinical trials;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043929
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Bench to bedside translation of groundbreaking treatments like chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy depends on patient participation in early phase trials. Unfortunately, many novel therapies fail to be adequately evaluated due to low recruitment rates, which slows patient access to emerging treatments. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), we sought to identify potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase CAR-T cell therapy trial. Design We used qualitative semistructured interviews to identify potential barriers and enablers to patients' hypothetical participation in an early phase CAR-T cell therapy trial. We used the TDF and directed content analysis to identify relevant domains based on frequency, relevance and the presence of conflicting beliefs. Participants Canadian adult patients diagnosed with haematological malignancies. Results In total, we interviewed 13 participants (8 women, 5 men). Participants ranged in age from 18 to 73 (median=56) and had been living with haematological cancer from a few months to several years. We found participants were unfamiliar with CAR-T cell therapy but wished to know more about treatment safety, efficacy and trial logistics (domains: knowledge, beliefs about consequences). They were motivated by altruistic considerations, though many prioritised personal health benefits despite recognising the goals (ie, establishing safety) of early phase clinical trials (domains: goals, intentions). Every participant valued receiving medical advice from their haematologists and oncologists, though some preferred impartial medical experts to inform their decision making (domain: social influences). Finally, participants indicated that improving access to financial and social supports would improve their trial participation experience (domain: environmental context and resources). Conclusion Using the TDF allowed us to identify factors that might undermine participation to a CAR-T cell therapy trial and to optimise recruitment processes by considering patient perspectives to taking part in early phase trials. Trial regestration: NCT03765177; Pre-results.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials
    Albrecht, TL
    Blanchard, C
    Ruckdeschel, JC
    Coovert, M
    Strongbow, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) : 3324 - 3332
  • [2] A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems
    Atkins, Lou
    Francis, Jill
    Islam, Rafat
    O'Connor, Denise
    Patey, Andrea
    Ivers, Noah
    Foy, Robbie
    Duncan, Eilidh M.
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Lawton, Rebecca
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [3] Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    Winterbottom, Anna E.
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dillard, Amanda J.
    Feldman-Stewart, Deb
    Fowler, Floyd J.
    Jibaja-Weiss, Maria L.
    Shaffer, Victoria A.
    Volk, Robert J.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
  • [4] Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy
    Bell, Jennifer A. H.
    Balneaves, Lynda G.
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (04) : 1169 - 1196
  • [5] Benson A, 2016, J CLIN ONCOL, V34, DOI [10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.3616, 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2257]
  • [6] Biedrzycki Barbara A, 2010, Oncol Nurs Forum, V37, pE387, DOI 10.1188/10.ONF.E387-E399
  • [7] Canadian Cancer Research Alliance, 2011, Report on the state of cancer clinical trials in Canada
  • [8] Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research
    Cane, James
    O'Connor, Denise
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
  • [9] Behavior Change Techniques and Their Mechanisms of Action: A Synthesis of Links Described in Published Intervention Literature
    Carey, Rachel N.
    Connell, Lauren E.
    Johnston, Marie
    Rothman, Alexander J.
    de Bruin, Marijn
    Kelly, Michael P.
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 (08) : 693 - 707
  • [10] Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation
    Cartmell, Kathleen B.
    Bonilha, Heather S.
    Matson, Terri
    Bryant, Debbie C.
    Zapka, Jane
    Bentz, Tricia A.
    Ford, Marvella E.
    Hughes-Halbert, Chanita
    Simpson, Kit N.
    Alberg, Anthony J.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 3 : 86 - 93