Germ-line engineering, freedom, and future generations

被引:8
作者
Cooke, EF [1 ]
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Dept Philosophy, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-8519.00320
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
New technologies in germ-line engineering have raised many questions about obligations to future generations. In this article, I focus on the importance of increasing freedom and the equality of freedom for Present and future generations, because these two ideals are necessary for a just society and. because they are most threatened by the wide-scale privatisation of GLE technologies. However, there are ambiguities in applying these ideals to the issue of genetic technologies. I argue that Amartya Sen's capability theory can be used as a framework to ensure freedom and equality in the use of GLE technology. Capability theory articulates the goal of equalising real freedom by bringing all people up to a threshold of basic human capabilities. Sen's capability theory can clarify the proper moral goal of GLE insofar as this technology could be used to bring people up to certain basic human capabilities, thereby increasing their real freedom. And by increasing the freedom of, those who lack basic human capabilities, GLE can aid in decreasing the inequalities of freedom among classes of people.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 58
页数:27
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], JUST HLTH CARE
[2]  
Bayertz K., 1994, GENETHICS
[3]  
BERGER EM, 1996, MORALITY NEW GENETIC, P220
[4]  
BERT B, 1997, BIOETHICS RETURN FUN
[5]  
BUCHANAN A, 2000, CHANCE CHOICE GENETI, P304
[6]  
Daniels N., 1992, GROWTH GENETICS H S1, V8, P46
[7]   Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future [J].
Davis, DS .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1997, 27 (02) :7-15
[8]  
Feinberg Joel., 1980, Whose Child? Children's Rights, Parental Authority, and State Power, P124
[9]  
Fox Evelyn Keller., 2000, Controlling our destinies: Historical, philosophical, ethical, P273
[10]  
Harris J., 1992, WONDERWOMAN SUPERMAN