Establishing Benchmarks For Minimum Competence With Dry Lab Robotic Surgery Drills

被引:24
作者
Siddiqui, Nazema Y. [1 ]
Tarr, Megan E. [2 ]
Geller, Elizabeth J. [3 ]
Advincula, Arnold P. [4 ]
Galloway, Michael L. [5 ]
Green, Isabel C. [6 ]
Hur, Hye-Chun [7 ]
Pitter, Michael C. [4 ]
Burke, Emily E. [8 ]
Martino, Martin A. [9 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, DUMC 3192, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Charlotte Campus, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Charlotte Campus, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] Wright State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[8] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, DUMC 3192, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[9] Lehigh Valley Hlth Network, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Allentown, PA USA
关键词
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills; Robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills; Robotic surgery; Simulation; Surgical education; Technical skills; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; STANDARD; ASSESSMENTS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The Robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (R-OSATS) is a previously validated assessment tool that is used to assess 5 standardized inanimate robotic surgery drills. R-OSATS is used to evaluate performance on surgical drills, with scores of 0 to 20 for each drill. Our objective was to establish the minimum threshold score that denotes competence on these drills.. Thus, we performed a standard setting study using data from surgeons and trainees in 8 academic medical centers. Cutoff scores for the minimal level of competence using R-OSATS were established using 2 techniques: the modified Angoff and the contrasting groups methods. For the modified Angoff method, 8 content experts met and, in an iterative process, derived the scores that a minimally competent trainee should receive. After 2 iterative rounds of scoring and discussion with the modified Angoff method, we established a minimum competence score per drill with high agreement (r(wG) range, 0.92-0.98). There was unanimous consensus that a trainee needs to achieve competence on each independent drill. A second method, the contrasting groups method, was used to verify our results. In this method, we compared R-OSATS scores from "inexperienced" (34 postgraduate year 1 and 2 trainees) with "experienced" (22 faculty and fellow) robotic surgeons. The distributions of scores from both groups were plotted, and a cutoff score for each drill was determined from the intersection of the 2 curves. Using this method, the minimum score for competence would be 14 per drill, which is slightly more stringent but confirms the results obtained from the modified Angoff approach. In conclusion, using 2 well-described standard setting techniques, we have established minimum benchmarks designating trainee competence for 5 dry lab robotic surgery drills. (C) 2016 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 638
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, ED MEASUREMENT
[2]   Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit [J].
Arain, Nabeel A. ;
Dulan, Genevieve ;
Hogg, Deborah C. ;
Rege, Robert V. ;
Powers, Cathryn E. ;
Tesfay, Seifu T. ;
Hynan, Linda S. ;
Scott, Daniel J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (10) :2740-2745
[3]   A Modified Contrasting Groups Method Used for Setting the Passmark in a Small Scale Standardised Patient Examination [J].
Burrows, Peter J. ;
Bingham, Liz ;
Brailovsky, Carlos A. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 1999, 4 (02) :145-154
[4]   A CONTRASTING-GROUPS APPROACH TO STANDARD-SETTING FOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS OF CLINICAL SKILLS [J].
CLAUSER, BE ;
CLYMAN, SG .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1994, 69 (10) :S42-S44
[5]   Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education [J].
Downing, SM ;
Tekian, A ;
Yudkowsky, R .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2006, 18 (01) :50-57
[6]   Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery [J].
Dulan, Genevieve ;
Rege, Robert V. ;
Hogg, Deborah C. ;
Gilberg-Fisher, Kristine M. ;
Arain, Nabeel A. ;
Tesfay, Seifu T. ;
Scott, Daniel J. .
SURGERY, 2012, 152 (03) :477-488
[7]   Robotic surgery basic skills training: Evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary simulation-based curriculum [J].
Foell, Kirsten ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Yasufuku, Kazuhiro ;
Bernardini, Marcus Q. ;
Waddell, Thomas K. ;
Pace, Kenneth T. ;
Honey, R. John D. 'A. ;
Lee, Jason Y. .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (11-12) :430-434
[8]   Estimating the minimum number of judges required for test-centred standard setting on written assessments. Do discussion and iteration have an influence? [J].
Fowell, S. L. ;
Fewtrell, R. ;
Mclaughlin, P. J. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2008, 13 (01) :11-24
[9]   PERSONALITY, AFFECT, AND BEHAVIOR IN GROUPS [J].
GEORGE, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (02) :107-116
[10]   Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods [J].
Hung, Andrew J. ;
Jayaratna, Isuru S. ;
Teruya, Kara ;
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Goh, Alvin C. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (06) :864-871