Visual Verification of Cancer Staging for Therapy Decision Support

被引:12
作者
Cypko, M. A. [1 ]
Wojdziak, J. [2 ,3 ]
Stoehr, M. [4 ]
Kirchner, B. [3 ]
Preim, B. [5 ]
Dietz, A. [4 ]
Lemke, H. U. [1 ]
Oeltze-Jafra, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Fac Med, ICCAS, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Media Design, Dresden, Germany
[3] Gesell Tech Visualistik mbH, Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Leipzig, Head & Neck Dept, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Univ Magdeburg, Dept Simulat & Graph, Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
HEAD;
D O I
10.1111/cgf.13172
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
It is generally accepted practice that each cancer patient case should be discussed in a clinical expert meeting, the so-called tumor board. A central role in finding the best therapy options for patients with solid tumors plays the Tumor, lymph Node, and Metastasis staging (TNM staging). Correctness of TNM staging has a significant impact on the therapy choice and hence on the patient's post-therapeutic quality of life or even survival. If inconsistencies in the TNM staging occur, possible explanations and solutions must be found based on the complex patient records, which takes the costly time of (multiple) physicians. We propose a more efficient visual analysis component, which supports a physician in verifying the given TNM staging before forwarding it to the tumor board. Our component comprises a Bayesian network model of the TNM staging process. Using information from the patient records and Bayesian inference, the models computes a patient-specific TNM staging, which is then explored and compared to the given staging by means of a graph-based visualization. Our component is implemented in a research prototype that supports an understanding of the model computations, allows for a fast identification of important influencing factors, and facilitates a quick detection of differences between two TNM stagings. We evaluated our component with five physicians, each studying 20 cases of laryngeal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 120
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Amin MB, 2017, CA CANC J CLIN
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, THESIS U TECHNOLOGY
  • [3] [Anonymous], INFORM VISUALIZATION
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, PROBABILISTIC REASON
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
  • [6] Bostock M., 2015, D3 JS DATADRIVEN DOC
  • [7] Chiang C.-H., 2005, Visualizing graphical probabilistic models
  • [8] Coleman MK, 1996, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER, V26, P1415, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-024X(199612)26:12<1415::AID-SPE69>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-P
  • [10] Cypko M. A., 2017, INT J COMPUTER ASSIS, P1