Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics

被引:148
|
作者
Li, Yuqiu [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Keping [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ruohan [1 ,2 ]
Gold, Michael R. [3 ]
Zhang, Shu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis,Arrhythmia Ctr, 167 North Lishi Rd, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, 167 North Lishi Rd, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Cardiol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bradycardia; Left bundle branch pacing; Pacemaker; Physiological pacing; Success rate; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE ABLATION; PERMANENT; METAANALYSIS; CATHETER; ATRIAL; LEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND In patients with or without left bundle branch block, left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) can produce near normalization of QRS duration (QRSd). This has recently emerged as an alternative technique to His bundle pacing. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to characterize a novel approach for LBBP in patients with bradycardia indications for pacing and to assess implant success rate and midterm safety. METHODS Patients with bradycardia indications for pacing underwent LBBP by a trans-ventricular-septal method in the basal ventricular septum. Procedural success, pacing parameters, and complications were assessed at implantation and at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS This prospective study evaluated 87 patients (sinus node dysfunction 67.8%; atrioventricular conduction disease 32.2%) undergoing pacemaker implantation. LBBP implantation succeeded in 80.5% (70/87) of patients and the remaining 17 patients received right ventricular septal pacing. The procedure time of LBBP implantation was 18.0 +/- 8.8 minutes with a fluoroscopic exposure time of 3.9 +/- 2.7 minutes. LBBP produced narrower electrocardiographic QRSd than did right ventricular septal pacing (113.2 +/- 9.9 ms vs 144.4 +/- 12.8 ms; P < .001). There were no major implantationrelated complications. The pacing threshold was low (0.76 +/- 0.22 V at implantation and 0.71 +/- 0.23 V at 3 months), with no loss of capture or lead dislodgment observed. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that in patients with standard bradycardia pacing indications, LBBP results in QRSd, 120 ms in most patients and can be performed successfully and safely in the majority of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1758 / 1765
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Left bundle branch pacing on mechanical synchrony and myocardial work in bradycardia patients
    PeiWei Wang
    Li Yang
    ShaoXin Zheng
    JingTing Mai
    YuLing Wei
    YingMei Liu
    BingQing Deng
    HanLu Lv
    YangXin Chen
    Qiong Qiu
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2023, 39 : 369 - 378
  • [32] Left bundle branch pacing on mechanical synchrony and myocardial work in bradycardia patients
    Wang, PeiWei
    Yang, Li
    Zheng, ShaoXin
    Mai, JingTing
    Wei, YuLing
    Liu, YingMei
    Deng, BingQing
    Lv, HanLu
    Chen, YangXin
    Qiu, Qiong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2023, 39 (02) : 369 - 378
  • [33] Intracardiac ultrasound-guided left bundle branch pacing in a bradycardia patient
    Zhang, Jiefang
    Sun, Yaxun
    Zhang, Zuwen
    Jiang, Chenyang
    Fu, Guosheng
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2020, 8 (06): : 1030 - 1033
  • [34] Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Perfect Compromise?
    Raymond-Paquin, Alexandre
    Padala, Santosh K.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 10 (04) : 241 - 243
  • [35] Is the pacing site closer to the left ventricular septal endocardium in left bundle branch pacing or in left ventricular septal pacing?
    Peng, Xin-Yi
    Wang, Yan-Jiang
    Sun, Lan-Lan
    Shi, Liang
    Cheng, Chao-Di
    Huang, Li-Hong
    Tian, Ying
    Liu, Xing-Peng
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (03) : 539 - 549
  • [36] Autothreshold algorithm feasibility and safety in left bundle branch pacing
    Sola-Garcia, Elena
    Molina-Lerma, Manuel
    Jimenez-Jaimez, Juan
    Macias-Ruiz, Rosa
    Sanchez-Millan, Pablo J.
    Tercedor, Luis
    Alvarez, Miguel
    EUROPACE, 2023, 26 (01):
  • [37] Feasibility, safety and outcomes of left bundle branch pacing in octogenarians
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Bopanna, Dasarath
    Syed, Thabish
    Muthu, Giridhar
    Kumar, Surya
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 73 (01) : 117 - 120
  • [38] Feasibility and safety of zero-fluoroscopy left bundle branch pacing: An initial experience
    Ramos-Maqueda, Javier
    Melero-Polo, Jorge
    Montilla-Padilla, Isabel
    Ruiz-Arroyo, Jose Ramon
    Cabrera-Ramos, Mercedes
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (02) : 429 - 437
  • [39] Is the pacing site closer to the left ventricular septal endocardium in left bundle branch pacing or in left ventricular septal pacing?
    Xin-Yi Peng
    Yan-Jiang Wang
    Lan-Lan Sun
    Liang Shi
    Chao-Di Cheng
    Li-Hong Huang
    Ying Tian
    Xing-Peng Liu
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023, 66 : 539 - 549
  • [40] Electrophysiological characteristics of septal perforation during left bundle branch pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Basil, William
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (05) : 728 - 734