Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics

被引:148
|
作者
Li, Yuqiu [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Keping [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ruohan [1 ,2 ]
Gold, Michael R. [3 ]
Zhang, Shu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis,Arrhythmia Ctr, 167 North Lishi Rd, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, 167 North Lishi Rd, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Cardiol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bradycardia; Left bundle branch pacing; Pacemaker; Physiological pacing; Success rate; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE ABLATION; PERMANENT; METAANALYSIS; CATHETER; ATRIAL; LEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND In patients with or without left bundle branch block, left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) can produce near normalization of QRS duration (QRSd). This has recently emerged as an alternative technique to His bundle pacing. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to characterize a novel approach for LBBP in patients with bradycardia indications for pacing and to assess implant success rate and midterm safety. METHODS Patients with bradycardia indications for pacing underwent LBBP by a trans-ventricular-septal method in the basal ventricular septum. Procedural success, pacing parameters, and complications were assessed at implantation and at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS This prospective study evaluated 87 patients (sinus node dysfunction 67.8%; atrioventricular conduction disease 32.2%) undergoing pacemaker implantation. LBBP implantation succeeded in 80.5% (70/87) of patients and the remaining 17 patients received right ventricular septal pacing. The procedure time of LBBP implantation was 18.0 +/- 8.8 minutes with a fluoroscopic exposure time of 3.9 +/- 2.7 minutes. LBBP produced narrower electrocardiographic QRSd than did right ventricular septal pacing (113.2 +/- 9.9 ms vs 144.4 +/- 12.8 ms; P < .001). There were no major implantationrelated complications. The pacing threshold was low (0.76 +/- 0.22 V at implantation and 0.71 +/- 0.23 V at 3 months), with no loss of capture or lead dislodgment observed. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that in patients with standard bradycardia pacing indications, LBBP results in QRSd, 120 ms in most patients and can be performed successfully and safely in the majority of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1758 / 1765
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects
    Liu, Peng
    Wang, Qiaozhu
    Sun, Hongke
    Qin, Xinghua
    Zheng, Qiangsun
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [22] Feasibility, safety and outcomes of upgrading to left bundle branch pacing in patients with right ventricular pacing induced cardiomyopathy
    Rademakers, Leonard M.
    Bouwmeester, Sjoerd
    Mast, Thomas P.
    Dekker, Lukas
    Houthuizen, Patrick
    Bracke, Frank A.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (06): : 726 - 732
  • [23] Lowering the threshold for left bundle branch area pacing
    Cerbin, Lukasz P.
    Garg, Lohit
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : 1537 - 1539
  • [24] Feasibility and Safety of Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Advance Aged Patients: A Multicenter Comparative Study
    Ren, Zhongyuan
    Cai, Binni
    Wang, Songyun
    Jia, Peng
    Chen, Yang
    Guo, Rong
    Li, Hailing
    Zhang, Jun
    Xiong, Jing
    Zhang, Jingying
    Yang, Haotian
    Li, Xiang
    Xu, Yawei
    Chen, Xueying
    Zhao, Dongdong
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [25] How to Implant His Bundle and Left Bundle Pacing Leads: Tips and Pearls
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    CARDIAC FAILURE REVIEW, 2021, 7
  • [26] Left bundle branch pacing versus left ventricular septal pacing as a primary procedural endpoint during left bundle branch area pacing: Evaluation of two different implant strategies
    Cano, Oscar
    Jover, Pablo
    Ayala, Hebert D.
    Navarrete-Navarro, Javier
    Osca, Joaquin
    Izquierdo, Maite
    Navarro, Josep
    Martinez-Dolz, Luis
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (01) : 120 - 129
  • [27] Left bundle branch pacing preserved left ventricular myocardial work in patients with bradycardia
    Chen, Huang-Chung
    Liu, Wen-Hao
    Chen, Yung-Lung
    Lee, Wei-Chieh
    Fang, Yen-Nan
    Chong, Shaur-Zheng
    Chen, Mien-Cheng
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [28] A diagnostic dilemma of left bundle branch pacing
    Iida, Yoji
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (06) : 1491 - 1494
  • [29] Durability of left bundle branch area pacing
    Mehta, Nikhil A.
    Saqi, Bilal
    Sabzwari, Syed R. A.
    Gupta, Rahul
    Vyas, Apurva
    Gordon, Jeffrey
    Cossu, Sergio
    Nazir, Talha
    Freudenberger, Ronald
    Bozorgnia, Babak
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : 1529 - 1536
  • [30] Left bundle branch pacing: A comprehensive review
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Arora, Vanita
    Namboodiri, Narayanan
    Kumar, Vivek
    Kapoor, Aditya
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (09) : 2462 - 2473