Self-Adaptive Ensemble-based Differential Evolution with Enhanced Population Sizing

被引:3
作者
Budiman, Haldi [1 ]
Li Wang, Shir [2 ]
Morsidi, Farid [2 ]
Ng, Theam Foo [3 ]
Neoh, Siew Chin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari, Fak Teknol Informasi, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
[2] Univ Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Fac Art Comp & Creat Ind, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
[3] Unversiti Sains Malasyia, Ctr Global Sustainabil Studies, George Town, Malaysia
[4] Univ Nottingham Malaysia, Fac Sci, Sch Comp Sci, Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ICORIS 2020: 2020 THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBERNETICS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEM (ICORIS) | 2020年
关键词
Differential evolution; self-adaptive; ensemble; control parameters; mutation strategies; population size; CONTROL PARAMETERS; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/ICORIS50180.2020.9320767
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Differential Evolution (DE) a branch of Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) is recently prominently sough after in teerms of global optimization purpose. The pinpointed issues for this work sheds light on its impact towards population diversity and dimension size. In retrospect of balance incorporation among exploration and exploitation capability, DE emphasizes on preference of control parameters. The algorithm scheme, known as self-adaptive ensemble- based differential evolution with enhanced population sizing (SAEDE-EP), is compared to self-adaptive ensemble-based DE (SAEDE). The SAEDE-EP algorithm is proposed to minimize user setting and exhausting trial-and-error procedure for appropriately configuring scale factor, crossover rate, mutation strategy, and population size. In SAEDE-EP, an ensemble is used to trigger the change of diversity in population when the best solutions between generations have been stagnant for a certain period. The performance is appraised based on 26 benchmark functions comprising on 8 low dimensions and 18 high dimensions. Experimental results indicate that SAEDE-EP achieves maximum success rate with better efficiency in 24 out of the 26 benchmark functions.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Gamperle R., 2002, Advances in Intelligent Systems, Fuzzy Systems, Evolutionary Computation
[2]  
Gómez J, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2724, P1580
[3]   Improving Differential Evolution With a Successful-Parent-Selecting Framework [J].
Guo, Shu-Mei ;
Yang, Chin-Chang ;
Hsu, Pang-Han ;
Tsai, Jason S. -H. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 19 (05) :717-730
[4]   Self-adaptive differential evolution with global neighborhood search [J].
Guo, Zhaolu ;
Liu, Gang ;
Li, Dahai ;
Wang, Shenwen .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 21 (13) :3759-3768
[5]  
Iorio AW, 2004, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V3339, P861
[6]  
Jamil NA, 2015, PROCEEDINGS 5TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL SYSTEM, COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (ICCSCE 2015), P287, DOI 10.1109/ICCSCE.2015.7482199
[7]  
Jeyakumar G., 2011, INT J ARTIF INTELL A, V2
[8]  
Kadhar K., 2015, DIVERSITY CONTROLLED
[9]  
Liang JJ, 2005, 2005 IEEE SWARM INTELLIGENCE SYMPOSIUM, P68
[10]   Differential evolution algorithm with ensemble of parameters and mutation strategies [J].
Mallipeddi, R. ;
Suganthan, P. N. ;
Pan, Q. K. ;
Tasgetiren, M. F. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 11 (02) :1679-1696