The use of qualitative system dynamics to identify sustainability characteristics of decentralized wastewater management alternatives

被引:30
作者
Guest, J. S. [1 ]
Skerlos, S. J. [2 ]
Daigger, G. T. [3 ]
Corbett, J. R. E. [4 ]
Love, N. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Mech Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] CH2M Hill Inc, Englewood, CO 80112 USA
[4] Associated Engn Grp Ltd, Burnaby, BC V5G 4M5, Canada
关键词
decentralized sanitation infrastructure; planning and design; sustainability metrics; triple bottom line; wastewater treatment; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; RESOURCE RECOVERY; UNCERTAINTY; VALUATION; PARADIGMS; FRAMEWORK; CRITERIA; DESIGN; FUTURE;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2010.880
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In order to pursue more sustainable alternatives in wastewater management, it is vital that we understand how a given infrastructure alternative will impact the various aspects of sustainability. A set of qualitative tools (force field diagrams and causal loop diagrams (CLDs)) for the assessment of wastewater management alternatives is proposed and demonstrated in the context of a decentralized wastewater infrastructure upgrade. The objective for the application of these tools is to improve decision makers' understanding of how a given alternative will impact the economic, environmental/ ecological, social, and functional aspects of sustainability. In the proposed method, each aspect of sustainability is treated as a stock, and its movement (up or down) can be inferred using both qualitative and quantitative data. By incorporating these tools into a participatory planning process, project-specific CLDs can be developed and loops of interest can be identified to help elucidate stakeholder values. The ultimate goal of this methodology is to facilitate the pursuit of sustainability in wastewater management by allowing decision makers to address specific sustainability challenges without creating new ones.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / 1644
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making [J].
Ascough, J. C., II ;
Maier, H. R. ;
Ravalico, J. K. ;
Strudley, M. W. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 219 (3-4) :383-399
[2]   Making asset investment decisions for wastewater systems that include sustainability [J].
Ashley, Richard ;
Blackwood, David ;
Butler, David ;
Jowitt, Paul ;
Davies, John ;
Smith, Heidi ;
Gilmour, Daniel ;
Oltean-Dumbrava, Crina .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2008, 134 (03) :200-209
[3]  
Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC
[4]   Charting a path for innovative toilet technology using multicriteria decision analysis [J].
Borsuk, Mark E. ;
Maurer, Max ;
Lienert, Judit ;
Larsen, Tove A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (06) :1855-1862
[5]  
BROWN RR, 2008, DATA REQUIREMENTS IN, P159
[6]   Contingent valuation: A user's guide [J].
Carson, RT .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (08) :1413-1418
[7]  
Conklin J., 2005, Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problem
[8]  
*CRD, 2009, WAST TREATM MAD CLEA
[9]  
Daigger G.T., 2007, J ENV ENG MANAGEMENT, V17, P1
[10]   Evolving Urban Water and Residuals Management Paradigms: Water Reclamation and Reuse, Decentralization, and Resource Recovery [J].
Daigger, Glen T. .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2009, 81 (08) :809-823