What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? A panel data analysis for european firms

被引:65
作者
Ziegler, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Schroeder, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Ctr Corp Responsibil & Sustainabil, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Ctr Econ Res, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Ctr European Econ Res ZEW, D-68161 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
Corporate sustainability performance; Sustainability stock indexes; Corporate financial performance; Panel data; Probit models; Simulated maximum likelihood estimation; MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; PARTICIPATION; INFORMATION; INCENTIVES; INVESTMENT; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.10.009
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper empirically examines the determinants of the inclusion of European firms in the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index and the Dow Jones Stoxx Sustainability Index. While a restricted econometric analysis implies a positive effect of corporate financial performance, this impact becomes ambiguous in more flexible panel probit models. Our estimation results therefore strengthen the importance of the use of panel data and the incorporation of unobserved heterogeneity. Furthermore, our analysis shows that the sustainability assessment and selection process for the composition of the Dow Jones sustainability, indexes and thus factors that need not necessarily be directly connected to corporate environmental or social activities also have an influence. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 856
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance [J].
Anton, WRQ ;
Deltas, G ;
Khanna, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :632-654
[2]   AN EXPERIMENT IN VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION - PARTICIPATION IN EPAS 33/50 PROGRAM [J].
ARORA, S ;
CASON, TN .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 28 (03) :271-286
[3]   Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 program [J].
Arora, S ;
Cason, TN .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (04) :413-432
[4]  
Baltagi H. D., 2005, Econometric analysis of panel data, V3rd ed.
[5]   International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style [J].
Bauer, R ;
Koedijk, K ;
Otten, R .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (07) :1751-1767
[6]   The ethical mutual fund performance debate: New evidence from Canada [J].
Bauer, Rob ;
Derwall, Jeroen ;
Otten, Roger .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 70 (02) :111-124
[7]   SMOOTH UNBIASED MULTIVARIATE PROBABILITY SIMULATORS FOR MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION OF LIMITED DEPENDENT VARIABLE MODELS [J].
BORSCHSUPAN, A ;
HAJIVASSILIOU, VA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1993, 58 (03) :347-368
[8]   Impact of the FTSE4Good Index on firm price: An event study [J].
Curran, M. Martin ;
Moran, Dominic .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 82 (04) :529-537
[9]   What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry [J].
Dasgupta, S ;
Hettige, H ;
Wheeler, D .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 39 (01) :39-66
[10]   Pollution and capital markets in developing countries [J].
Dasgupta, S ;
Laplante, B ;
Mamingi, N .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 42 (03) :310-335