Evaluating ecological risks and tracking potential factors influencing heavy metals in sediments in an urban river

被引:37
|
作者
Liu, Dongping [1 ]
Wang, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Huibin [1 ]
Gao, Hongjie [1 ]
Xu, Weining [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Heavy metals; Canonical correlation analysis; Principal component analysis; Potential ecological risk index; DISSOLVED ORGANIC-MATTER; SURFACE SEDIMENTS; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; GEOCHEMICAL SPECIATION; POLLUTION ASSESSMENT; TRACE-METALS; CONTAMINATION; WATER; BAY; LAKE;
D O I
10.1186/s12302-021-00487-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background Heavy metal pollution of aquatic systems is a global issue that has received considerable attention. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA), principal component analysis (PCA), and potential ecological risk index (PERI) have been applied to heavy metal data to trace potential factors, identify regional differences, and evaluate ecological risks. Sediment cores of 200 cm in depth were taken using a drilling platform at 10 sampling sites along the Xihe River, an urban river located in western Shenyang City, China. Then they were divided into 10 layers (20 cm each layer). The concentrations of the As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn were measured for each layer. Eight heavy metals, namely Pb, Zn, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Hg, were measured for each layer in this study. Results The average concentrations of the As, Cd, Cu, Hg, and Zn were significantly higher than their background values in soils in the region, and mainly gathered at 0-120 cm in depth in the upstream, 0-60 cm in the midstream, and 0-20 cm downstream. This indicated that these heavy metals were derived from the upstream areas where a large quantity of effluents from the wastewater treatment plants enter the river. Ni, Pb, and Cr were close or slightly higher than their background values. The decreasing order of the average concentration of Cd was upstream > midstream > downstream, so were Cr, Cu, Ni and Zn. The highest concentration of As was midstream, followed by upstream and then downstream, which was different to Cd. The potential factors of heavy metal pollution were Cd, Cu, Hg, Zn, and As, especially Cd and Hg with the high ecological risks. The ecological risk levels of all heavy metals were much higher in the upstream than the midstream and downstream. Conclusions Industrial discharge was the dominant source for eight heavy metals in the surveyed area, and rural domestic sewage has a stronger influence on the Hg pollution than industrial pollutants. These findings indicate that effective management strategies for sewage discharge should be developed to protect the environmental quality of urban rivers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Distribution and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals using geochemical normalization factors in the aquatic sediments
    Arisekar, Ulaganathan
    Shakila, Robinson Jeya
    Shalini, Rajendren
    Jeyasekaran, Geevartnam
    Keerthana, Muruganantham
    Arumugam, Natarajan
    Almansour, Abdulrahman, I
    Perumal, Karthikeyan
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 294
  • [42] Ecological risk assessment and sources identification of heavy metals in surface sediments of a river-reservoir system
    Li, Xincheng
    Bing, Jianping
    Zhang, Junhong
    Guo, Liquan
    Deng, Zhimin
    Wang, Dangwei
    Liu, Linshuang
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 842
  • [43] Heavy metal in sediments of Ziya River in northern China: distribution, potential risks, and source apportionment
    Zhu, Xiaolei
    Shan, Baoqing
    Tang, Wenzhong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (23) : 23511 - 23521
  • [44] Ecological risks and potential sources of heavy metals in agricultural soils from Huanghuai Plain, China
    Zhou, Lingli
    Yang, Bing
    Xue, Nandong
    Li, Fasheng
    Seip, Hans Martin
    Cong, Xin
    Yan, Yunzhong
    Liu, Bo
    Han, Baolu
    Li, Huiying
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2014, 21 (02) : 1360 - 1369
  • [45] Health and ecological risks assessment of heavy metals and metalloids in surface sediments of Urmia Salt Lake, Northwest of Iran
    Khosravi, Roghayeh
    Mansour, Sepideh Nemati
    Ekrami, Jahangir
    Mosaferi, Mohammad
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (03)
  • [46] Spatial Distribution, Ecological Risk Assessment, and Source Identification of Metals in Sediments of the Krka River Estuary (Croatia)
    Cukrov, Nusa
    Cindric, Ana-Marija
    Omanovic, Dario
    Cukrov, Neven
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [47] Receptor model-based source apportionment and ecological risk of metals in sediments of an urban river in Bangladesh
    Proshad, Ram
    Kormoker, Tapos
    Al, Mamun Abdullah
    Islam, Md Saiful
    Khadka, Sujan
    Idris, Abubakr M.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2022, 423
  • [48] Distribution, ecological risk, and source analysis of heavy metals in sediments of Taizihe River, China
    Wang, Qi
    Chen, Qiuying
    Yan, Dong
    Xin, Shigang
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2018, 77 (16)
  • [49] Spatial distributions, potential sources, and ecological risks of heavy metals in stream sediments in Zambia
    Sun, Hongwei
    Ren, Junping
    Wang, Jie
    Yu, Jianzhong
    Zuo, Libo
    Wu, Xingyuan
    Mukofu, Chipilauka
    Dokowe, Alphet Phaskani
    Cao, Shuping
    Cheng, Xujiang
    JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 2025, 270
  • [50] Ecological risk of heavy metals in sediment of an urban river in Bangladesh
    Islam, Md Saiful
    Proshad, Ram
    Ahmed, Saad
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2018, 24 (03): : 699 - 720