The evolving global plastics policy landscape: An inventory and effectiveness review

被引:44
作者
Diana, Zoie [1 ]
Vegh, Tibor [2 ]
Karasik, Rachel [2 ]
Bering, Janet [3 ]
Caldas, Juan D. Llano [3 ]
Pickle, Amy [2 ]
Rittschof, Daniel [1 ]
Lau, Winnie [4 ]
Virdin, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Marine Lab, Nicholas Sch Environm, Div Marine Sci & Conservat, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Nicholas Inst Environm Policy Solut, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[4] Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC 20004 USA
关键词
Plastic pollution policy; Evidence-based policy making; Monitoring; Causal inference; Marine plastic; Plastic bags; MARINE POLLUTION; REDUCE; IMPACT; BAGS; LESSONS; WASTE; TAX; PERCEPTIONS; AGREEMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2022.03.028
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Governments worldwide are increasingly adopting public policies, laws, and ordinances to reduce plastic pollution. To date, studies have not analyzed the content of, and trends in, these policies. Employing a content analysis and literature search, we set out to better understand: (i) governments responses to this problem over time, and (ii) the state of the available evidence on the effectiveness of policy responses. Our motivations were to: (i) expand evidence-based policy-making to reduce plastic pollution by identifying and classifying the policy instruments used by governments; (ii) compile evidence regarding policy effectiveness; and (iii) provide a global database in the form of a Plastics Policy Inventory (https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/plastics-policy-inventory) to track government responses, as requested by the United Nations Environment Assembly in Resolution 4/6. Policies that fell within our scope aimed to reduce plastic pollution beyond business-as-usual solid waste management schema. This Inventory and study have an English-language bias. International and national policies are fairly representative of plastic pollution policies and the subnational (e.g., states, cities) policies are examples. International governments most frequently used plans and commitments for future action. National and sub national governments most frequently used bans. Ten policies targeted only microplastics and one policy targeted tire wear particles, lagging reported pollution. The peer-reviewed literature reported plastic bag consumption reductions between 27% and 100% after policy adoption. This work lays a foundation for future evidence-based policymaking to reduce plastic pollution and provides a useful tool to track policies, analyze existing policies from new angles, and target gaps in the global plastics policy landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 45
页数:12
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [41] Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made
    Geyer, Roland
    Jambeck, Jenna R.
    Law, Kara Lavender
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (07):
  • [42] Gold M., 2013, Stemming the tide of plastic marine litter: A global action agenda, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.042
  • [43] Google Scholar, 2020, ABOUT US
  • [44] Government of Canada P.W. and G.S.C. 2021, CAN GAZ 2
  • [45] Gupta D.K., 2011, ANAL PUBLIC POLICY C, V2nd, pc2011
  • [46] Gupta K., 2011, Is a Ban the Best Way to Reduce Plastic Bag Use? A Case Study from Delhi
  • [47] Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews
    Haddaway, N. R.
    Woodcock, P.
    Macura, B.
    Collins, A.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (06) : 1596 - 1605
  • [48] Plastic pollution of the world's seas and oceans as a contemporary challenge in ocean governance
    Haward, Marcus
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
  • [49] Effects of environmental policy on consumption: lessons from the Chinese plastic bag regulation
    He, Haoran
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 17 : 407 - 431
  • [50] Tackling the plastic problem: A review on perceptions, behaviors, and interventions
    Heidbreder, Lea Marie
    Bablok, Isabella
    Drews, Stefan
    Menzel, Claudia
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 668 : 1077 - 1093