Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation

被引:167
作者
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Capalbo, Antonio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vaiarelli, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Cimadomo, Danilo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Colamaria, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Alviggi, Carlo [4 ,5 ]
Trabucco, Elisabetta [1 ,2 ]
Venturella, Roberta [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Vajta, Gabor [7 ,8 ]
Rienzi, Laura [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] GENERA Ctr Reprod Med, Valle Giulia Clin, Via G De Notaris 2b, I-00197 Rome, Italy
[2] GENERA Ctr Reprod Med, Ruesch Clin, Naples, Italy
[3] Genetyx SRL Labs, Vicenza, Italy
[4] Univ Rome, Dipartimento Sci Anat Istol Med Legali & Apparato, Sez Istol & Embriol Med, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Naples, Italy
[6] Univ Catanzaro, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Catanzaro, Italy
[7] BGI Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[8] Cent Queensland Univ, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia
关键词
Euploid blastocyst yield; luteal phase stimulation; oocyte collection; ovarian stimulation; PGD-A; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; PREGNANCY; DYNAMICS; VITRIFICATION; BIRTH; IMPLANTATION; MORPHOLOGY; OVULATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the euploid blastocyst formation rates obtained after follicular phase (FP) versus luteal phase (LP) stimulation performed in the same menstrual cycle in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A) program in patients with reduced ovarian reserve. Design: Prospective paired noninferiority observational study. Setting: Private infertility program. Patient(s): Forty-three reduced ovarian reserve patients undergoing a PGD-A. Intervention(s): Both FP and LP stimulations using follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in combination with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist starting on day 2 of the cycle and 5 days after the first oocyte retrieval, respectively, where GnRH agonist was used for both FP and LP ovulation triggering; a trophectoderm biopsy quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based PGD-A strategy; and single euploid blastocyst transfers during a subsequent natural cycle. Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary outcome measure: euploid blastocyst rate per injected metaphase 2 (MII) oocyte; secondary outcome measures: number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), MII oocytes, and blastocysts. Result(s): Patients with an antimullerian hormone level of <1.5 ng/mL, antral follicle count of <6 follicles, and/or <5 oocytes retrieved in a previous cycle were included. No statistically significant differences were found in the number of retrieved COCs (5.1 +/- 3.4 vs. 5.7 +/- 3.3), MII oocytes (3.4 +/- 1.9 vs. 4.1 +/- 2.5), or biopsied blastocysts per stimulated cycle (1.2 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.4 +/- 1.7) from FP versus LP stimulation, respectively. No differences were observed in the euploid blastocyst rate calculated either per biopsied blastocyst (46.9% vs. 44.8%) or injected MII oocyte (16.2% vs. 15.0%). Conclusion(s): Stimulation with an identical protocol in the FP and LP of the same menstrual cycle resulted in a similar number of blastocysts in patients with reduced ovarian response. The LP stimulation statistically significantly contributed to the final transferable blastocyst yield, thus increasing the number of patients undergoing transfer per menstrual cycle. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1488 / U147
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Large animal models for the study of ovarian follicular dynamics in women
    Adams, G. P.
    Singh, J.
    Baerwald, A. R.
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 2012, 78 (08) : 1733 - 1748
  • [2] ADAMS GP, 1990, J REPROD FERTIL, V90, P535, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0900535
  • [3] Adams GP, 1999, J REPROD FERTIL, P17
  • [4] Adamson GD, 2009, WOMENS HEALTH, V5, P351, DOI [10.2217/whe.09.28, 10.2217/WHE.09.28]
  • [5] A new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle
    Baerwald, AR
    Adams, GP
    Pierson, RA
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (01) : 116 - 122
  • [6] Characterization of ovarian follicular wave dynamics in women
    Baerwald, AR
    Adams, GP
    Pierson, RA
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2003, 69 (03) : 1023 - 1031
  • [7] More than one fertile ovulation per cycle?
    Baird, DD
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (03) : 729 - 729
  • [8] Ovarian stimulation during the luteal phase for fertility preservation of cancer patients: case reports and review of the literature
    Bedoschi, Giuliano M.
    de Albuquerque, Felipe Oliveira
    Ferriani, Rui Alberto
    Navarro, Paula Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2010, 27 (08) : 491 - 494
  • [9] An ongoing pregnancy from two waves of follicles developing during a long follicular phase of the same cycle
    Bentov, Yaakov
    Esfandiari, Navid
    Gokturk, Asli
    Burstein, Eliezer
    Fainaru, Ofer
    Casper, Robert F.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (01) : 350.e8 - 350.e11
  • [10] Effective method for emergency fertility preservation: random-start controlled ovarian stimulation
    Cakmak, Hakan
    Katz, Audra
    Cedars, Marcelle I.
    Rosen, Mitchell P.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (06) : 1673 - 1680