Understanding trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services to support the decision-making in the Beijing?Tianjin?Hebei region

被引:142
作者
Feng, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Xueru [3 ]
Chen, Tianqian [1 ]
Wu, Jiansheng [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] MNR, Technol Innovat Ctr Land Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Urban Planning & Design, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Trade-offs; Bayesian belief networks; Probabilistic inference; Beijing?Tianjin?Hebei region; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; LAND-USE CHANGE; HABITAT QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; RISK; MODELS; AREA; QUANTIFICATION; URBANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105446
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies is the foundation to achieve the efficient management of the ecosystem and improve human well-being. However, the current research involving the driving mechanism of ecosystem service relationship formation is still limited. In this paper, a semi-quantitative model named Bayesian belief networks is introduced to simulate ecological processes, which links the potential influencing factors with the ecosystem service supply. The purpose of this paper is to help understand the ecosystem service relationship and provide management decision-making reference. Taking the Beijing?Tianjin?Hebei region as a study area, four ecosystem services (habitat quality, carbon storage, water yield, and soil retention services) were quantified and mapped in 2015. Based on a created Bayesian belief network simulating the ecosystem service supply, the sensitivity analysis was used to identify the key factors affecting the ecosystem service supply. Besides, the relationship between ecosystem services was identified and the driving mechanism was analyzed through the Bayesian probabilistic inference. The main conclusions demonstrate the following. (1) The spatial heterogeneity of the ecosystem service supply in the Beijing?Tianjin?Hebei region is relatively strong. (2) The key factors affecting ecosystem services are the land use type, vegetation coverage, precipitation, slope, evapotranspiration, and population density. (3) Habitat quality, carbon storage, and soil retention services synergize one another, and there are trade-offs between water yield service and habitat quality, carbon storage, and soil retention services, respectively. (4) Among the land use type, vegetation coverage, slope, and population density, the land use type has the most important impact on ecosystem service trade-offs. As a practice of combining Bayesian belief networks and ecosystem services, this study can contribute to a research method of ecosystem service relationships and references for the management decision-making on maximizing the overall benefits of ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Predicting land cover using GIS, Bayesian and evolutionary algorithm methods [J].
Aitkenhead, M. J. ;
Aalders, I. H. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (01) :236-250
[2]  
Allen R.G.L.S., 1998, 56 FAO
[3]   Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services in agricultural production systems [J].
Balbi, Stefano ;
del Prado, Agustin ;
Gallejones, Patricia ;
Geevan, Chandanathil Pappachan ;
Pardo, Guillermo ;
Perez-Minana, Elena ;
Manrique, Rosa ;
Hernandez-Santiago, Cuitlahuac ;
Villa, Ferdinando .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 72 :314-326
[4]   Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values [J].
Barbier, Edward B. ;
Koch, Evamaria W. ;
Silliman, Brian R. ;
Hacker, Sally D. ;
Wolanski, Eric ;
Primavera, Jurgenne ;
Granek, Elise F. ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Aswani, Shankar ;
Cramer, Lori A. ;
Stoms, David M. ;
Kennedy, Chris J. ;
Bael, David ;
Kappel, Carrie V. ;
Perillo, Gerardo M. E. ;
Reed, Denise J. .
SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5861) :321-323
[5]   Assessing ecosystem services from multifunctional trees in pastures using Bayesian belief networks [J].
Barton, David N. ;
Benjamin, Tamara ;
Cerdan, Carlos R. ;
DeClerck, Fabrice ;
Madsen, Anders L. ;
Rusch, Graciela M. ;
Salazar, Alvaro G. ;
Sanchez, Dalia ;
Villanueva, Cristobal .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 18 :165-174
[6]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[7]   Application of Bayesian Networks in the development of herbs and spices sampling monitoring system [J].
Bouzembrak, Yamine ;
Camenzuli, Louise ;
Janssen, Esmee ;
van der Fels-Klerx, H. J. .
FOOD CONTROL, 2018, 83 :38-44
[8]   Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services [J].
Busch, Malte ;
La Notte, Alessandra ;
Laporte, Valerie ;
Erhard, Markus .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :89-103
[9]   An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia [J].
Butler, James R. A. ;
Wong, Grace Y. ;
Metcalfe, Daniel J. ;
Honzak, Miroslav ;
Pert, Petina L. ;
Rao, Nalini ;
van Grieken, Martijn E. ;
Lawson, Tina ;
Bruce, Caroline ;
Kroon, Frederieke J. ;
Brodie, Jon E. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 180 :176-191
[10]   Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? [J].
Costanza, Robert ;
de Groot, Rudolf ;
Braat, Leon ;
Kubiszewski, Ida ;
Fioramonti, Lorenzo ;
Sutton, Paul ;
Farber, Steve ;
Grasso, Monica .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 :1-16