Comparison of Bingham Filter and Extended Kalman Filter in IMU Attitude Estimation

被引:12
|
作者
Wang, Weixin [1 ,2 ]
Adamczyk, Peter G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Mech Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
IMU attitude; Bingham filter; multiplicative extended Kalman filter (MEKF); Bingham distribution; SO(3) filter; attitude estimation;
D O I
10.1109/JSEN.2019.2922321
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper reports the implementation of the Bingham filter (BF), a recently developed stochastic filter on SO(3), in the IMU attitude estimation problem. The BF uses the Bingham distribution, a probability distribution defined on the unit three-sphere, i.e., the space of unit quaternions, to model the attitude of a rigid body, and uses Bayes' formula to update the prediction with new attitude measurements. We compared the BF with the widely used multiplicative extended Kalman filter (MEKF) for accuracy and convergence speed through both the simulated and experimental IMU data. We used the gyroscope and accelerometer signals to estimate the tilt attitude (roll and pitch) with heading angle left uncorrected. We tested two types of measurements: attitude converted from measured acceleration and the measured acceleration itself. Results showed some benefits of BF over MEKF in terms of estimation accuracy and convergence speed from large initial errors. However, the computational cost of BF is also much higher than MEKF. Incidental findings also showed that using the full acceleration measurement improves the accuracy of the MEKF compared to using the attitude measurement converted from acceleration.
引用
收藏
页码:8845 / 8854
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Attitude estimation based on extended Kalman filter for a two-wheeled robot
    Wang, Xiao-Yu
    Yan, Ji-Hong
    Qin, Yong
    Zhao, Jie
    Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007, 39 (12): : 1920 - 1924
  • [22] Nonlinear Extended Kalman Filter for Attitude Estimation of the Fixed-Wing UAV
    Xiaoqian, Tang
    Feicheng, Zhao
    Zhengbing, Tang
    Hongying, Wang
    International Journal of Optics, 2022, 2022
  • [23] Nonlinear Extended Kalman Filter for Attitude Estimation of the Fixed-Wing UAV
    Xiaoqian, Tang
    Feicheng, Zhao
    Zhengbing, Tang
    Hongying, Wang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPTICS, 2022, 2022
  • [24] ADAPTIVE ITERATED EXTENDED KALMAN FILTER FOR RELATIVE SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE AND POSITION ESTIMATION
    Xiong, Kai
    Wei, Chunling
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2018, 20 (04) : 1595 - 1610
  • [25] Iterated Multiplicative Extended Kalman Filter for Attitude Estimation Using Vector Observations
    Chang, Lubin
    Hu, Baiqing
    Li, Kailong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2016, 52 (04) : 2053 - 2060
  • [26] Multiplicative Quaternion Extended Consensus Kalman Filter for Attitude and Augmented State Estimation
    Fan Chunshi
    Meng Ziyang
    Liu Xiaoyun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE 2016, 2016, : 8043 - 8048
  • [27] Error-Covariance Reset in the Multiplicative Extended Kalman Filter for Attitude Estimation
    Markley, F. Landis
    Cheng, Yang
    Crassidis, John L.
    Reynolds, Reid G.
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2023, 46 (10) : 1860 - 1873
  • [28] A Sequential Multiplicative Extended Kalman Filter for Attitude Estimation Using Vector Observations
    Qin, Fangjun
    Chang, Lubin
    Jiang, Sai
    Zha, Feng
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (05)
  • [29] A Performance Comparison Between Extended Kalman Filter and Unscented Kalman Filter in Power System Dynamic State Estimation
    Khazraj, Hesam
    da Silva, F. Faria
    Bak, Claus Leth
    2016 51ST INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (UPEC), 2016,
  • [30] Spacecraft attitude estimation based on matrix Kalman filter and recursive cubature Kalman filter
    Zhang, Tao
    Xu, Xiang
    Wang, Zhicheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2018, 232 (16) : 3024 - 3033