Quantum entanglement in physical and cognitive systems: A conceptual analysis and a general representation

被引:24
作者
Aerts, D. [1 ]
Arguelles, J. Aerts [1 ]
Beltran, L. [1 ]
Geriente, S. [1 ]
de Bianchi, M. Sassoli [1 ,2 ]
Sozzo, S. [3 ,4 ]
Veloz, T. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Brussels Free Univ, Ctr Leo Apostel, Krijgskundestr 33, B-1160 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Lab Autoric Base, Via Cadepiano 18, CH-6917 Barbengo, Switzerland
[3] Univ Leicester, Sch Business, Univ Rd, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[4] Univ Leicester, Ctr IQSCS, Univ Rd, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[5] Univ Andres Bello, Dept Ciencias Biol, Fac Ciencias Vida, Santiago 8370146, Chile
[6] Fdn Desarrollo Interdisciplinario Ciencia Tecnol, Santiago, Chile
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
BELL INEQUALITIES; HIDDEN-VARIABLES; HILBERT-SPACE; VIOLATION; MECHANICS; INFORMATION; NONLOCALITY; SITUATION; PHOTONS; REALITY;
D O I
10.1140/epjp/i2019-12987-0
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
We provide a general description of the phenomenon of entanglement in bipartite systems, as it manifests in micro and macro physical systems, as well as in human cognitive processes. We do so by observing that when genuine coincidence measurements are considered, the violation of the 'marginal laws', in addition to the Bell-CHSH inequality, is also to be expected. The situation can be described in the quantum formalism by considering the presence of entanglement not only at the level of the states, but also at the level of the measurements. However, at the "local" level of a specific joint measurement, a description where entanglement is only incorporated in the state remains always possible, by adopting a fine-tuned tensor product representation. But contextual tensor product representations should only be considered when there are good reasons to describe the outcome-states as (non-entangled) product states. This will not in general be true, hence, the entanglement resource will have to generally be allocated both in the states and in the measurements. In view of the numerous violations of the marginal laws observed in physics' laboratories, it remains unclear to date if entanglement in micro-physical systems is to be understood only as an 'entanglement of the states', or also as an 'entanglement of the measurements'. But even if measurements would also be entangled, the corresponding violation of the marginal laws (also called 'no-signaling conditions') would not for this imply that a superluminal communication would be possible.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Is the fair sampling assumption supported by EPR experiments?
    Adenier, Guillaume
    Khrennikov, Andrei Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS B-ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND OPTICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 40 (01) : 131 - 141
  • [2] Test of the no-signaling principle in the Hensen loophole-free CHSH experiment
    Adenier, Guillaume
    Khrennikov, Andrei Yu.
    [J]. FORTSCHRITTE DER PHYSIK-PROGRESS OF PHYSICS, 2017, 65 (09):
  • [3] Quantum aspects of semantic analysis and symbolic artificial intelligence
    Aerts, D
    Czachor, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 2004, 37 (12): : L123 - L132
  • [4] A theory of concepts and their combinations - II - A Hilbert space and representation
    Aerts, D
    Gabora, L
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2005, 34 (1-2) : 192 - 221
  • [5] The violation of Bell inequalities in the macroworld
    Aerts, D
    Aerts, S
    Broekaert, J
    Gabora, L
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS, 2000, 30 (09) : 1387 - 1414
  • [6] EXAMPLE OF A MACROSCOPICAL CLASSICAL SITUATION THAT VIOLATES BELL INEQUALITIES
    AERTS, D
    [J]. LETTERE AL NUOVO CIMENTO, 1982, 34 (04): : 107 - 111
  • [7] AERTS D, 1991, HELV PHYS ACTA, V64, P1
  • [8] AERTS D, 1984, HELV PHYS ACTA, V57, P421
  • [9] Aerts D., 1990, PROBLEMS QUANTUM PHY, VII
  • [10] Aerts D., 1995, Foundations of Science, V1, P85