Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and 5-Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

被引:1
作者
Livi, L. [1 ]
Saieva, C. [2 ]
Borghesi, S.
Cardillo, C. De Luca
Scotti, V.
Mangoni, M.
Greto, D.
Cataliotti, L. [3 ]
Paiar, F.
Bianchi, S. [4 ]
Biti, G. P.
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Radiotherapy Oncol, Radiotherapy Unit, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[2] Canc Prevent & Res Inst, ISPO, Mol & Nutr Epidemiol Unit, Florence, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Dept Surg, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Pathol, I-50134 Florence, Italy
关键词
Breast cancer; cyclophosphamide; methotrexate; doxorubicin; 5-fluorouracil; PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; FLUOROURACIL; EPIRUBICIN; CMF; TAMOXIFEN; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1179/joc.2009.21.5.558
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study evaluated whether doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide are superior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Between July 1976 and December 2004, 1045 breast cancer patients received adjuvant chemotherapy at the Radiotherapy Unit of the University of Florence. 927 were administered i.v. CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days for a total of six cycles) and 118 i.v. DC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) on day 1 repeated every 21 days for a total of four cycles). All patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy as well. The survival analysis, stratified according to treatment, did not show any significant difference in metastasis occurrence between the two groups (log rank test p=0.42). According to multivariate analysis four parameters emerged as independent prognostic factors for distant metastases in patients treated with the CMF regimen: pT (p=0.0005), number of positive axillary lymph nodes (p=<0.0001), tamoxifen use (p=0.0109) and local relapses (p=<0.0001). Only number of positive axillary lymph nodes and local relapses were significant predictors of metastases occurrence according to multivariate analysis in the DC group, 17 and p=0.028, respectively. No significant difference between the two regimens was observed with regards to number of involved nodes. DC and CMF produced similar outcome in breast cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 565
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ABE O, 1992, LANCET, V339, P71
[2]   Dose-intensive epirubicin-based chemotherapy is superior to an intensive intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimen in metastatic breast cancer: A randomized multinational study [J].
Ackland, SP ;
Anton, A ;
Breitbach, GP ;
Colajori, E ;
Tursi, JM ;
Delfino, C ;
Efremidis, A ;
Ezzat, A ;
Fittipaldo, A ;
Kolaric, K ;
Lopez, M ;
Viaro, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) :943-953
[3]   Benefit of a high-dose epirubicin regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors:: 5-year follow-up results of French adjuvant study group 05 randomized trial [J].
Adenis, A ;
Bonneterre, J ;
Bonneterre, ME ;
Pion, JM ;
Vanlemmens, L ;
Gladieff, L ;
de Lafontan, B ;
Martel, P ;
Mihura, J ;
Roché, H ;
Gédouin, D ;
Kerbrat, P ;
Lesimple, T ;
Brémond, A ;
Devaux, Y ;
Delecroix, V ;
Fumoleau, P ;
Maugard-Louboutin, C ;
Namer, M ;
Goudier, MJ ;
Morice, F ;
Montcuquet, P ;
Schraub, S ;
Coudert, B ;
Fargeot, P ;
de Gislain, C ;
Mayer, F ;
Bastit, P ;
Chevallier, B ;
Grandgirard, A ;
Monnier, A ;
Sun, X ;
Clavère, P ;
Ollivier, JP ;
Rhein, B ;
Roullet, B ;
Datchary, J ;
Audhuy, B ;
Barats, JC ;
Kohser, F ;
Dides, S ;
Ramos, R ;
Cattan, A ;
Eymard, JC ;
Pourny, C ;
Weber, B ;
de Laroche, G ;
Pichon, A ;
Seffert, P ;
Hayat, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (03) :602-611
[4]   Phase III randomized multicenter study on the effects of adjuvant CMF in patients with node-negative, rapidly proliferating breast cancer: twelve-year results and retrospective subgroup analysis [J].
Amadori, Dino ;
Nanni, Oriana ;
Volpi, Annalisa ;
Giunchi, Donata Casadei ;
Marangolo, Maurizio ;
Livi, Lorenzo ;
Ravaioli, Alberto ;
Rossi, Andrea Paolo ;
Gambi, Angelo ;
Fedeli, Stefano Luzi ;
Perroni, Davide ;
Scarpi, Emanuela ;
Becciolini, Aldo ;
Silvestrini, Rosella .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 108 (02) :259-264
[5]  
Bang SM, 2000, CANCER, V89, P2521, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001215)89:12<2521::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-F
[7]   COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY AS AN ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN OPERABLE BREAST-CANCER [J].
BONADONNA, G ;
BRUSAMOLINO, E ;
VALAGUSSA, P ;
ROSSI, A ;
BRUGNATELLI, L ;
BRAMBILLA, C ;
DELENA, M ;
TANCINI, G ;
BAJETTA, E ;
MUSUMECI, R ;
VERONESI, U .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1976, 294 (08) :405-410
[8]  
CARPENTER JT, 1994, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V13, P68
[9]   Dose-response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer [J].
Colleoni, M ;
Price, K ;
Castiglione-Gertsch, M ;
Goldhirsch, A ;
Coates, A ;
Lindtner, J ;
Collins, J ;
Gelber, RD ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Rudenstam, CM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (11) :1693-1700
[10]   Breast cancer: Achievements in adjuvant systemic therapies in the pre-genomic era [J].
Colozzaa, Mariantonietta ;
de Azambuja, Evandro ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Bernard, Chantal ;
Piccart, Martine J. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2006, 11 (02) :111-125