Validity of breast, lung and colorectal cancer diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review protocol

被引:14
作者
Abraha, Iosief [1 ]
Giovannini, Gianni [1 ]
Serraino, Diego [2 ]
Fusco, Mario [3 ]
Montedori, Alessandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Reg Hlth Author Umbria, Hlth Planning Serv, Perugia, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ctr Riferimento Oncol Aviano, Epidemiol & Biostat Unit, Aviano, Italy
[3] Registro Tumori Reg Campania, ASL NA3 Sud, Brusciano, Na, Italy
关键词
International Classification of Diseases; Administrative database; Sensitivity and Specificity; Breast; lung and colorectal disease; Validity; METASTATIC BREAST; HEALTH OUTCOMES; CARE; CHEMOTHERAPY; ACCURACY; PATTERNS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010409
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Breast, lung and colorectal cancers constitute the most common cancers worldwide and their epidemiology, related health outcomes and quality indicators can be studied using administrative healthcare databases. To constitute a reliable source for research, administrative healthcare databases need to be validated. The aim of this protocol is to perform the first systematic review of studies reporting the validation of International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th revision codes to identify breast, lung and colorectal cancer diagnoses in administrative healthcare databases. Methods and analysis This review protocol has been developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. We will search the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, using appropriate search strategies. We will include validation studies that used administrative data to identify breast, lung and colorectal cancer diagnoses or studies that evaluated the validity of breast, lung and colorectal cancer codes in administrative data. The following inclusion criteria will be used: (1) the presence of a reference standard case definition for the disease of interest; (2) the presence of at least one test measure (eg, sensitivity, positive predictive values, etc) and (3) the use of data source from an administrative database. Pairs of reviewers will independently abstract data using standardised forms and will assess quality using a checklist based on the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy (STARD) criteria. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required. We will submit results of this study to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. The results will serve as a guide to identify appropriate case definitions and algorithms of breast, lung and colorectal cancers for researchers involved in validating administrative healthcare databases as well as for outcome research on these conditions that used administrative healthcare databases. Trial registration number CRD42015026881.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.G7647
[2]   Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data [J].
Benchimol, Eric I. ;
Manuel, Douglas G. ;
To, Teresa ;
Griffiths, Anne M. ;
Rabeneck, Linda ;
Guttmann, Astrid .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (08) :821-829
[3]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) :40-44
[4]   An international comparison of costs of end-of-life care for advanced lung cancer patients using health administrative data [J].
Bremner, Karen E. ;
Krahn, Murray D. ;
Warren, Joan L. ;
Hoch, Jeffrey S. ;
Barrett, Michael J. ;
Liu, Ning ;
Barbera, Lisa ;
Yabroff, K. Robin .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (10) :918-928
[5]   Mini-Sentinel's systematic reviews of validated methods for identifying health outcomes using administrative and claims data: methods and lessons learned [J].
Carnahan, Ryan M. ;
Moores, Kevin G. .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 21 :82-89
[6]   Risks of Breast and Endometrial Cancer in Women with Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study [J].
Chen, Hua-Fen ;
Liu, Ming-Der ;
Chen, Peter ;
Chen, Li-Huan ;
Chang, Ya-Hui ;
Wen, Pei-Chun ;
Li, Chung-Yi .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06)
[7]   Tradeoffs between accuracy measures for electronic health care data algorithms [J].
Chubak, Jessica ;
Pocobelli, Gaia ;
Weiss, Noel S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (03) :343-349
[8]   Use of Electronic Medical Records for Health Outcomes Research A Literature Review [J].
Dean, Bonnie B. ;
Lam, Jessica ;
Natoli, Jaime L. ;
Butler, Qiana ;
Aguilar, Daniel ;
Nordyke, Robert J. .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2009, 66 (06) :611-638
[9]   Who gets chemotherapy for metastatic lung cancer? [J].
Earle, CC ;
Venditti, LN ;
Neumann, PJ ;
Gelber, RD ;
Weinstein, MC ;
Potosky, AL ;
Weeks, JC .
CHEST, 2000, 117 (05) :1239-1246
[10]   Trends in the surgical procedures of women with incident breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain, over a 7-year period (2005-2011) [J].
Escribà J.M. ;
Pareja L. ;
Esteban L. ;
Gálvez J. ;
Melià A. ;
Roca L. ;
Clèries R. ;
Sanz X. ;
Bustins M. ;
Pla M.J. ;
Gil M.J. ;
Borrás J.M. ;
Ribes J. .
BMC Research Notes, 7 (1)