A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations

被引:310
作者
Hittner, JB [1 ]
May, K
Silver, NC
机构
[1] Coll Charleston, Dept Psychol, Charleston, SC 29424 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Dept Psychol, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
关键词
dependent correlations; Monte Carlo simulation; statistical power; Type I error rate; zero-order;
D O I
10.1080/00221300309601282
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The authors conducted a Monte Carlo simulation of 8 statistical tests for comparing dependent zero-order correlations. In particular, they evaluated the Type I error rates and power of a number of test statistics for sample sizes (Ns) of 20, 50, 100, and 300 under 3 different population distributions (normal, uniform, and exponential). For the Type I error rate analyses, the authors evaluated 3 different magnitudes of the predictor-criterion correlations (rho(yx1) = rho(yx2) = 1,.4, and .7). For the power analyses, they examined 3 different effect sizes or magnitudes of discrepancy between rho(yx1) and rho(yx2) (values of .1,.3, and .6). They conducted all of the simulations at 3 different levels of predictor intercorrelation (rho(x1,y2) = .1,.3, and .6). The results indicated that both Type I error rate and power depend not only on sample size and population distribution, but also on (a) the predictor intercorrelation and (b) the effect size (for power) or the magnitude of the predictor-criterion correlations (for Type I error rate). When the authors considered Type I error rate and power simultaneously, the findings suggested that O. J. Dunn and V. A. Clark's (1969) z and E. J. Williams's (1959) t have the best overall statistical properties. The findings extend and refine previous simulation research and as such, should have greater utility for applied researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 168
页数:20
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
COX, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) :211-252
[2]  
BOYER JE, 1983, J ED STAT, V8, P75, DOI DOI 10.3102/10769986008001075
[3]   A COMPARISON OF FACTOR ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES [J].
BROWNE, MW .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1968, 33 (03) :267-&
[4]   CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS MEASURED ON SAME INDIVIDUALS [J].
DUNN, OJ ;
CLARK, V .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1969, 64 (325) :366-&
[5]   EFFECT OF VIOLATION OF NORMALITY ON THE T-TEST OF THE CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT [J].
EDGELL, SE ;
NOON, SM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 95 (03) :576-583
[6]  
Fisher RA, 1921, Metron, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.2307/2331973
[7]   EFFECT OF VIOLATION OF ASSUMPTIONS UPON SIGNIFICANCE LEVELS OF PEARSON R [J].
HAVLICEK, LL ;
PETERSON, NL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1977, 84 (02) :373-377
[8]   OLKINS NEW FORMULA FOR SIGNIFICANCE OF R13 VS R23 COMPARED WITH HOTELLINGS METHOD [J].
HENDRICKSON, GF ;
STANLEY, JC ;
HILLS, JR .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1970, 7 (02) :189-195
[9]   The selection of variates for use in prediction with some comments on the general problem of nuisance parameters [J].
Hotelling, H .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1940, 11 :271-283
[10]   Tests for comparing dependent correlations revisited: A Monte Carlo study [J].
May, K ;
Hittner, JB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1997, 65 (03) :257-269