Measuring supply chain risk: Predicting motor carriers' ability to withstand disruptive environmental change using conjoint analysis

被引:13
作者
Atwater, Craig [1 ]
Gopalan, Ram [2 ]
Lancioni, Richard [1 ]
Hunt, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Fox Sch Business, Dept Mkt & Supply Chain Management, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Business, Camden, NJ 08102 USA
关键词
Scoring model; Supply chain risk; Motor carriers; Conjoint analysis; TRANSPORTATION; PERFORMANCE; ISSUES; RESILIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.009
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Supply chain risk measurement is an expanding research stream that considers the ability of networked firms to anticipate and respond to significant environmental risks, including major disruptions and unexpected events. However measuring and quantifying supply chain risk has proved an enormous challenge and this research contributes to this goal by developing a risk assessment scorecard, using conjoint analysis, for motor carrier firms. The resultant motor-carrier scorecard has been scaled from 300 to 900, to resemble the well-known FICO score for assessing consumer creditworthiness. Our scoring model enables motor carriers - and the firms that depend upon them in intermodal supply chains - to assess carriers' ability to withstand major disruptive events, which are broadly defined as events which might lead to a significant drop in carriers' income and profitability (e.g., such as that which occurred on September 11, 2001). Carriers with weaker risk scores (<600, on a 300-900 scale) are more likely to experience financial distress (and as a result possibly exit the industry itself); those with scores above 600 are less likely to depart. The model correctly identified 77 percent of motor carriers that ultimately exited the trucking industry following the significant environmental disruption caused by 9/11. Our computational experience indicates that the model accuracy, quantified in terms of Type I and Type II errors, compares favorably to prior results reported in the credit scoring literature. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 378
页数:19
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Altman E.I., 1977, Journal of Banking and Finance, V1, P29, DOI DOI 10.1016/0378-4266(77)90017-6
[2]  
[Anonymous], WASHINGTON POST
[3]   Predicting corporate bankruptcy: where we stand? [J].
Aziz, M. Adnan ;
Dar, Humayon A. .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2006, 6 (01) :18-+
[4]   Modeling hazardous materials risks for different train make-up plans [J].
Bagheri, Morteza ;
Saccomanno, Frank ;
Fu, Liping .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2012, 48 (05) :907-918
[5]  
Balcaen S., 2006, Br. Account. Rev., V38, P63, DOI [10.1016/j.bar.2005.09.001, DOI 10.1016/J.BAR.2005.09.001]
[6]   FINANCIAL RATIOS AS PREDICTORS OF FAILURE [J].
BEAVER, WH .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1966, 4 :71-111
[7]   A bilevel flow model for hazmat transportation network design [J].
Bianco, Lucio ;
Caramia, Massimiliano ;
Giordani, Stefano .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 17 (02) :175-196
[8]   An Empirically Derived Framework of Global Supply Resiliency [J].
Blackhurst, Jennifer ;
Dunn, Kaitlin S. ;
Craighead, Christopher W. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2011, 32 (04) :374-391
[9]   An integrated approach to supply chain risk analysis [J].
Cagliano, Anna Corinna ;
De Marco, Alberto ;
Grimaldi, Sabrina ;
Rafele, Carlo .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2012, 15 (07) :817-840
[10]   Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements [J].
Chen, IJ ;
Paulraj, A .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2004, 22 (02) :119-150