CELT: a computerised evaluative learning tool for continuing professional development

被引:2
作者
Kelly, DR [1 ]
MacKay, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Postgrad Med Educ, Glasgow G12 9LX, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
education; medical; continuing; methods; learning; computer software; standards; students;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01298.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate a computerised, evaluative learning tool (CELT) designed to encourage self-directed learning and help users make changes in practice following learning. The study aimed to evaluate how CELT was used and to ascertain user perceptions of the program. Design Qualitative analysis of interviews and quantitative analysis of entries made using the software. Setting and subjects West of Scotland region, comprising six Health Board areas with a total of 2176 general practitioners (GPs), 39 of whom took part in the study. Results Of the 39 GPs who started on the project, 34 used CELT. Of these 34, 28 GPs sent in files and six did not. Of the 28 GPs who sent in files, 25 entered data and 76% (22/29) considered the program easy to use. The program was used 7 days a week during the day and night. It raised participants' awareness of the educational value of everyday experiences and led to increased thought about learning. In 41% (45/111) of entries there was evidence that some action had been initiated by users as a result of learning. Conclusions CELT was designed to encourage self-directed learning and help users make changes in practice following learning. The study has shown that it can be used to deliver individual continuing professional development. It encourages a disciplined approach to learning, promotes thought about learning needs and increases the ability of GPs to learn from everyday experiences. In some instances, users were able to apply what had been learned.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 367
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INTRO QUALITATIVE ME
[2]  
[Anonymous], ED GEN PRACTICE
[3]   Questioning behaviour in general practice: a pragmatic study [J].
Barrie, AR ;
Ward, AM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7121) :1512-1515
[4]  
Beecham L, 2000, BRIT MED J, V320, P1425
[5]   Continuing education for medical professionals: A reflective model [J].
Brigley, S ;
Young, Y ;
Littlejohns, P ;
McEwen, J .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 73 (855) :23-26
[6]  
Campion-Smith C, 1998, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V48, P1590
[7]  
Cantillon P, 1999, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V318, P1276
[8]   Impact of formal continuing medical education - Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? [J].
Davis, D ;
O'Brien, MAT ;
Freemantle, N ;
Wolf, FM ;
Mazmanian, P ;
Taylor-Vaisey, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (09) :867-874
[9]   Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes [J].
Davis, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (01) :21-39
[10]   Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care [J].
Ely, JW ;
Osheroff, JA ;
Ebell, MH ;
Bergus, GR ;
Levy, BT ;
Chambliss, ML ;
Evans, ER .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7206) :358-361