Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate and predictive factors among patients with breast cancer who underwent multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer

被引:29
作者
Elsayegh, Nisreen [1 ]
Webster, Rachel D. [2 ]
Barrera, Angelica M. Gutierrez [1 ]
Lin, Heather [3 ]
Kuerer, Henry M. [4 ]
Litton, Jennifer K. [1 ]
Bedrosian, Isabelle [4 ]
Arun, Banu K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Clin Canc Genet, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2018年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
BRCA carriers; CPM; multigene panel; non-BRCA carriers; VUS; BRCA1/2 MUTATION CARRIERS; RISK-REDUCTION; OVARIAN-CANCER; ATM GENE; FAMILIES; WOMEN; VARIANTS; SPECTRUM; HORMONE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.1519
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although multigene panel testing is increasingly common in patients with cancer, the relationship between its use among breast cancer patients with non-BRCA mutations or variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and disease management decisions has not been well described. This study evaluated the rate and predictive factors of CPM patients who underwent multigene panel testing. Three hundred and fourteen patients with breast cancer who underwent multigene panel testing between 2014 and 2017 were included in the analysis. Of the 314 patients, 70 elected CPM. Election of CPM by gene status was as follows: BRCA carriers (42.3%), non-BRCA carriers (30.1%), and VUS (10.6%). CPM election rates did not differ between non-BRCA carriers and BRCA carriers (P = 0.6205). Among non-BRCA carriers, negative hormone receptor status was associated with CPM (P = 0.0115). For those with a VUS, hormone receptor status was not associated with CPM (P = 0.1879). Although the rate of CPM between BRCA carriers and non-BRCA carriers was not significantly different, the predictors of CPM were different in each group. Our analyses shed the light on the increasing use of CPM among patients who are non-BRCA carriers as well those with a VUS. Our study elucidates the differing predictive factors of CPM election among BRCA carriers, non-BRCA carries, and those with a VUS. Our findings reveal the need for providers to be cognizant that non-BRCA genes and VUS drive women to elect CPM despite the lack of data for contralateral breast cancer risk associated with these genes.
引用
收藏
页码:2718 / 2726
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Challenging Considerations for the Surgeon
    Angelos, Peter
    Bedrosian, Isabelle
    Euhus, David M.
    Herrmann, Virginia M.
    Katz, Steven J.
    Pusic, Andrea
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (10) : 3208 - 3212
  • [2] Radiation Exposure, the ATM Gene, and Contralateral Breast Cancer in the Women's Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study
    Bernstein, Jonine L.
    Haile, Robert W.
    Stovall, Marilyn
    Boice, John D., Jr.
    Shore, Roy E.
    Langholz, Bryan
    Thomas, Duncan C.
    Bernstein, Leslie
    Lynch, Charles F.
    Olsen, Jorgen H.
    Malone, Kathleen E.
    Mellemkjaer, Lene
    Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise
    Rosenstein, Barry S.
    Teraoka, Sharon N.
    Diep, Anh T.
    Smith, Susan A.
    Capanu, Marinela
    Reiner, Anne S.
    Liang, Xiaolin
    Gatti, Richard A.
    Concannon, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (07) : 475 - 483
  • [3] Association Between Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Breast Cancer Outcomes by Hormone Receptor Status
    Brewster, Abenaa M.
    Bedrosian, Isabelle
    Parker, Patricia A.
    Dong, Wenli
    Peterson, Susan K.
    Cantor, Scott B.
    Crosby, Melissa
    Shen, Yu
    [J]. CANCER, 2012, 118 (22) : 5637 - 5643
  • [4] Excess risk for contralateral breast cancer in CHEK2*1100delC germline mutation carriers
    Broeks, A
    de Witte, L
    Nooijen, A
    Huseinovic, A
    Klijn, JGM
    van Leeuwen, FE
    Russell, NS
    van't Veer, LJ
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2004, 83 (01) : 91 - 93
  • [5] The spectrum of ATM missense variants and their contribution to contralateral breast cancer
    Broeks, Annegien
    Braaf, Linde M.
    Huseinovic, Angelina
    Schmidt, Marjanka K.
    Russell, Nicola S.
    van Leeuwen, Flora E.
    Hogervorst, Frans B. L.
    Van 't Veer, Laura J.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 107 (02) : 243 - 248
  • [6] Trends in use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy by racial/ethnic group and ER/PR status among patients with breast cancer: A SEER population-based study
    Brown, Derek
    Shao, Stephanie
    Jatoi, Ismail
    Shriver, Craig D.
    Zhu, Kangmin
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 42 : 24 - 31
  • [7] Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large United States sample
    Chen, SN
    Iversen, ES
    Friebel, T
    Finkelstein, D
    Weber, BL
    Eisen, A
    Peterson, LE
    Schildkraut, JM
    Isaacs, C
    Peshkin, BN
    Corio, C
    Leondaridis, L
    Tomlinson, G
    Dutsm, D
    Kerber, R
    Amos, CI
    Strong, LC
    Berry, DA
    Euthus, DM
    Parmigiani, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (06) : 863 - 871
  • [8] Comparison of Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Unilateral Total Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients
    Chung, Alice
    Huynh, Kelly
    Lawrence, Camelia
    Sim, Myung-Shin
    Giuliano, Armando
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (08) : 2600 - 2606
  • [9] CLAUS EB, 1991, AM J HUM GENET, V48, P232
  • [10] Claus EB, 1996, CANCER, V77, P2318, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2318::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO