How can public participation improve environmental governance in China? A policy simulation approach with multi-player evolutionary game

被引:122
作者
Chu, Zhaopeng [1 ,2 ]
Bian, Chen [3 ]
Yang, Jun [4 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Humanities & Law, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ Qinhuangdao, Sch Econ, Qinhuangdao, Peoples R China
[3] Northeastern Univ, Sch Business Adm, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[4] Acadia Univ, FC Manning Sch Business Adm, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada
关键词
Public participation; Environmental governance; Evolutionary game; Policy simulation; FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION; POLITICS; IMPLEMENTATION; STRATEGIES; TAXES; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106782
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study explores how public participation can help reshape environmental governance in China. As China is committed to constructing an ecological civilization, a new participatory mechanism has become necessary for promoting environmental democracy. A non-cooperative tripartite evolutionary game is employed to model the dynamic strategy interactions among local governments, polluting enterprises, and the public for participatory governance. A new mechanism design for public participation is proposed to accomplish cooperative evolutionary equilibrium. Simulations show that with adequate support, public monitoring and activism can help release local governments' supervision burden while still being able to reach the desired outcome. Public participation benefits cooperative equilibrium by reducing governance costs and improving policy flexibility, especially when long-term aspirations of reputational effects and environmental tax reform are embraced. Strong support and ensured independence are crucial for unleashing the full power of public participation in environmental governance. From a methodology perspective, policy simulation in an evolutionary game framework represents a novel addition to the research toolbox for policy studies.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   The coming of environmental authoritarianism [J].
Beeson, Mark .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2010, 19 (02) :276-294
[2]   Public values and goals for public participation [J].
Bidwell, David ;
Schweizer, Pia-Johanna .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 31 (04) :257-269
[3]   The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government [J].
Bingham, LB ;
Nabatchi, T ;
O'Leary, R .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2005, 65 (05) :547-558
[4]  
Bovenberg AL, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P985
[5]   Participation and environmental governance: Consensus, ambivalence and debate [J].
Bulkeley, H ;
Mol, APJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2003, 12 (02) :143-154
[6]   Environmental incidents in China: Lessons from 2006 to 2015 [J].
Cao, Guozhi ;
Yang, Lei ;
Liu, Lingxuan ;
Ma, Zongwei ;
Wang, Jinnan ;
Bi, Jun .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 633 :1165-1172
[7]   Listening to the Public - Enacting Power: Citizen Access, Standing and Influence in Public Participation Discourses [J].
Carvalho, Anabela ;
Pinto-Coelho, Zara ;
Seixas, Eunice .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2019, 21 (05) :563-576
[8]   Participatory governance in China: analysing state-society relations in participatory initiatives in Suzhou [J].
Chang, Ying ;
Lau, Mandy ;
Calogero, Pietro .
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING REVIEW, 2019, 41 (03) :329-352
[9]   Analysis of Multi-Stakeholders' Behavioral Strategies Considering Public Participation under Carbon Taxes and Subsidies: An Evolutionary Game Approach [J].
Chen, Wanting ;
Hu, Zhi-Hua .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
[10]   The Relationship among Government, Enterprise, and Public in Environmental Governance from the Perspective of Multi-Player Evolutionary Game [J].
Chen, Yingxin ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Tadikamalla, Pandu R. ;
Gao, Xutong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (18)