Immersion in Raloxifene does not significantly improve bone toughness or screw pull-out strength in multiple in vitro models

被引:4
|
作者
Eby, Michael R. [1 ]
Cristino, Danielle M. [2 ]
Counihan, Matthew [1 ]
Masada, Kendall M. [1 ]
Ahn, Jaimo [3 ]
Hast, Michael W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Biedermann Lab Orthopaed Res, 3450 Hamilton Walk,373A Stemmler Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Raloxifene; Fracture repair; Proximal humerus; Cadaveric; Biomechanics; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; FRACTURE FIXATION; LOCKING PLATE; BISPHOSPHONATES; AUGMENTATION; COLLAGEN; PREVALENCE; STRATEGIES; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-021-04342-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundFailure of surgical fixation in orthopaedic fractures occurs at a significantly higher rate in osteoporotic patients due to weakened osteoporotic bone. A therapy to acutely improve the mechanical properties of bone during fracture repair would have profound clinical impact. A previous study has demonstrated an increase in mechanical properties of acellular cortical canine bone after immersion in raloxifene. The goal of this study was to determine if similar treatment yields the same results in cancellous fetal bovine bone and whether this translates into a difference in screw pull-out strength in human cadaveric tissue.MethodsCancellous bone from fetal bovine distal femora underwent quasi-static four-point bending tests after being immersed in either raloxifene (20 mu M) or phosphate-buffered saline as a control for 7days (n=10). Separately, 5 matched pairs of human osteoporotic cadaveric humeral heads underwent the same procedure. Five 3.5mm unicortical cancellous screws were then inserted at standard surgical fixation locations to a depth of 30mm and quasi-static screw pull-out tests were performed.ResultsIn the four-point bending tests, there were no significant differences between the raloxifene and control groups for any of the mechanical properties - including stiffness (p=0.333) and toughness (p=0.546). In the screw pull-out tests, the raloxifene soaked samples and control samples had pullout strengths of 12274.3N and 89.5 +/- 63.8N, respectively.Conclusions Results from this study indicate that cancellous fetal bovine samples did not demonstrate an increase in toughness with raloxifene treatment, which is in contrast to previously published data that studied canine cortical bone. In vivo experiments are likely required to determine whether raloxifene will improve implant fixation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Immersion in Raloxifene does not significantly improve bone toughness or screw pull-out strength in multiple in vitro models
    Michael R. Eby
    Danielle M. Cristino
    Matthew Counihan
    Kendall M. Masada
    Jaimo Ahn
    Michael W. Hast
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [2] In vitro biomechanical study of pedicle screw pull-out strength based on different screw path preparation techniques
    Moldavsky, Mark
    Salloum, Kanaan
    Bucklen, Brandon
    Khalil, Saif
    Mehta, Jwalant S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 50 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [3] In vitro biomechanical study of pedicle screw pull-out strength based on different screw path preparation techniques
    Mark Moldavsky
    Kanaan Salloum
    Brandon Bucklen
    Saif Khalil
    Jwalant S. Mehta
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016, 50 : 177 - 182
  • [4] Screw insertion torque as parameter to judge the fixation. Assessment of torque and pull-out strength in different bone densities and screw-pitches
    Addevico, Francesco
    Morandi , Massimo
    Scaglione, Michelangelo
    Solitro, Giovanni F.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 72 : 130 - 135
  • [5] Effect of Drilling Techniques on Microcracks and Pull-Out Strength of Cortical Screw Fixed in Human Tibia: An In-Vitro Study
    Singh, Ravinder Pal
    Gupta, Vishal
    Pandey, Pulak Mohan
    Mridha, Asit Ranjan
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 49 (01) : 382 - 393