Predation risk affects relative strength of top-down and bottom-up impacts on insect herbivores

被引:0
|
作者
Denno, RF [1 ]
Gratton, C [1 ]
Döbel, H [1 ]
Finke, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Entomol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
bottom-up vs. top-down impact; phytophagous insect community; planthopper; plant nutrition; population suppression; predation; Prokelisia; risk of predation; sap-feeding insects; Spartina alterniflora; spider; trophic cascades;
D O I
10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1032:PRARSO]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Elucidating the relative strength of top-down and bottom-up forces in communities of phytophagus insects has been a major historical focus. Current consensus is that both forces play a role, but it is poorly known if these forces act differently on herbivores in the same assemblage and what factors underlie this variation. Using manipulative experiments with an assemblage of sap-feeding phytophagous insects (six species of plant-hoppers, leafhoppers, and heteropteran bugs) inhabiting intertidal Spartina marshes, we examined the association between herbivore behavior, risk of predation, and ultimately the relative impact of top-down (wolf spider predation) and bottom-up (host-plant nutrition) factors on the population density of each sap-feeding herbivore. A factorial experiment on open Spartina islets in the field (two levels of plant nutrition crossed with two levels of spider predation) showed that bottom-up and top-down manipulations differentially affected the various sap-feeders. Overall, bottom-up effects dominated in this sap-feeder community, whereby the density of all six sap-feeders increased when the nitrogen content of Spartina was elevated. By contrast, wolf-spider addition significantly suppressed populations of only the Prokelisia species and had little impact on the other four sap-feeder species in the community. Functional-response experiments and behavioral studies revealed that certain species (Prokelisia planthoppers) were at much higher risk of attack by wolf spiders than other sap-feeders in the assemblage and that risk of predation was associated with a species' particular "escape/defensive behavior." Moreover, risk of spider predation was roughly linked to the strength of top-down impacts in the field, because species with ineffective escape behaviors and a high risk of spider attack (Prokelisia planthoppers) were the only sap-feeders whose populations were suppressed by spider predation in the field. Thus, specific behavioral characteristics of the sap-feeders on Spartina influenced risk of predation and the relative strength of top-down and bottom-up impacts on their population dynamics. Notably, all herbivores in this system were positively influenced by elevated plant nutrition, only the common sap-feeder species (Prokelisia planthoppers) were adversely affected by spider predation, and it was the rarer sap-feeders in the assemblage that were least impacted by predation. These results call into question the overall pervasiveness of top-down forces and underscore the primacy of basal resources in structuring this community of phytophagous insects.
引用
收藏
页码:1032 / 1044
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up
    Nisbet, Euan
    Weiss, Ray
    SCIENCE, 2010, 328 (5983) : 1241 - 1243
  • [22] From bottom-up to top-down control of invertebrate herbivores in a retrogressive chronosequence
    Kempel, Anne
    Allan, Eric
    Gossner, Martin M.
    Jochum, Malte
    Grace, James B.
    Wardle, David A.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 26 (03) : 411 - 424
  • [23] TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP CONTROL OF STREAM PERIPHYTON - EFFECTS OF NUTRIENTS AND HERBIVORES
    ROSEMOND, AD
    MULHOLLAND, PJ
    ELWOOD, JW
    ECOLOGY, 1993, 74 (04) : 1264 - 1280
  • [25] Bacteria and Competing Herbivores Weaken Top-Down and Bottom-Up Aphid Suppression
    Blubaugh, Carmen K.
    Carpenter-Boggs, Lynne
    Reganold, John P.
    Schaeffer, Robert N.
    Snyder, William E.
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 9
  • [26] HOW STRESS AFFECTS ATTENTION: TOP-DOWN, BOTTOM-UP OR BOTH?
    Larra, Mauro
    von Haugwitz, Leon
    Wascher, Edmund
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 59 : S66 - S66
  • [27] Relative strength of top-down, bottom-up, and consumer species richness effects on pond ecosystems
    Wojdak, JM
    ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2005, 75 (04) : 489 - 504
  • [28] Habitat selection by large herbivores in a southern African savanna: the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces
    Burkepile, Deron E.
    Burns, Catherine E.
    Tambling, Craig J.
    Amendola, Elizabeth
    Buis, Greg M.
    Govender, Navashni
    Nelson, Victoria
    Thompson, Dave I.
    Zinn, Andrew D.
    Smith, Melinda D.
    ECOSPHERE, 2013, 4 (11):
  • [29] Anthropogenic bottom-up and top-down impacts on boreal breeding waterbirds
    Holopainen, Sari
    Jaatinen, Kim
    Laaksonen, Toni
    Linden, Andreas
    Nummi, Petri
    Piha, Markus
    Poysa, Hannu
    Toivanen, Tero
    Vaananen, Veli-Matti
    Alhainen, Mikko
    Lehikoinen, Aleksi
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [30] Impacts of warming on top-down and bottom-up controls of periphyton production
    Kazanjian, Garabet
    Velthuis, Mandy
    Aben, Ralf
    Stephan, Susanne
    Peeters, Edwin T. H. M.
    Frenken, Thijs
    Touwen, Jelle
    Xue, Fei
    Kosten, Sarian
    Van de Waal, Dedmer B.
    Domis, Lisette N. de Senerpont
    van Donk, Ellen
    Hilt, Sabine
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8