Effect of intercropping row ratios on yield and nutritive value of maize and cowpea fodder

被引:0
作者
Arif, Mohd. [1 ]
Kumar, Arvind [1 ]
Pourouchottamane, R. [1 ]
Gupta, D. L. [1 ]
Singh, M. K. [1 ]
Rai, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Cent Inst Res Goats, Makhdoom 281122, India
关键词
Dry matter intake; Fodder production efficiency; Fodder quality; Relative feed value; ZEA-MAYS L; FORAGE YIELD; QUALITY; NITROGEN; PRODUCTIVITY; MIXTURES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2020 at Agriculture Farm of ICAR- CIRG, Makhdoom to study the effect of various intercropping row ratios on fodder yield and quality in maize and cowpea combinations system. The treatments consist of nine intercropping combinations viz., sole maize, sole cowpea, maize + cowpea (1:1), maize + cowpea (2:1), maize + cowpea (1: 2), maize + cowpea (2:2), maize+ cowpea (3:1), maize + cowpea (1:3), maize + cowpea (3:3). The experiment was laid out in randomize block design with three replications. The study indicated that highest value of growth parameters viz., plant height of maize ( 216 cm) and cowpea (212 cm), number of leaves plant-1, stem thickness in maize and branches plant(-1) in cowpea were recorded in 1:3 row ratios of maize + cowpea intercropping. However, maximum value of total green and dry fodder yield was recorded with 2: 1 row ratios of maize + cowpea intercropping (38.0 and 7.7 t ha(-1)) followed by 3:1 row ratios (37.6 and 7.6 t ha-1). Further, 1:3 row ratios of maize + cowpea intercropping recorded significantly higher value of crude protein (7.94 and 17.68%), ether extract (1.21 and 2.69 %), ash content (7.60 and 12.74%), total digestible nutrients (63.77 and 64.23%) digestible dry matter (66.22 and 66.50%), relative feed quality (110.74 and 139.10%) and net energy for lactation (1.54 and 1.55 Mcal/kg) in fodder maize and cowpea, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] AOAC, 1990, Official Methods of Analysis
  • [2] Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology
    Brooker, Rob W.
    Bennett, Alison E.
    Cong, Wen-Feng
    Daniell, Tim J.
    George, Timothy S.
    Hallett, Paul D.
    Hawes, Cathy
    Iannetta, Pietro P. M.
    Jones, Hamlyn G.
    Karley, Alison J.
    Li, Long
    McKenzie, Blair M.
    Pakeman, Robin J.
    Paterson, Eric
    Schoeb, Christian
    Shen, Jianbo
    Squire, Geoff
    Watson, Christine A.
    Zhang, Chaochun
    Zhang, Fusuo
    Zhang, Junling
    White, Philip J.
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2015, 206 (01) : 107 - 117
  • [3] Effects of irrigation and plant density on yield, composition and in vitro digestibility of a new forage sorghum variety, Tal, at two maturity stages
    Carmi, Avner
    Aharoni, Yohav
    Edelstein, Menahem
    Umiel, Nakdimon
    Hagiladi, Amir
    Yosef, Edith
    Nikbachat, Moses
    Zenou, Abraham
    Miron, Joshua
    [J]. ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 131 (1-2) : 120 - 132
  • [4] Gill A. S, 1993, INDIAN FARMING, V42, P25
  • [5] Ginwal DS, 2019, INDIAN J ANIM SCI, V89, P57
  • [6] Hegde B., 1983, THESIS U AGR SCI BAN
  • [7] Horrocks R.D., 1999, Harvested Forages
  • [8] IGFRI Vision, VISION DOCUMENT
  • [9] Jeranyama P., 2004, Understanding Relative Feed Value (RFV) and Relative Forage Quality (RFQ)
  • [10] Kumar B, 2014, RANGE MANAG AGROFOR, V35, P263