Dynamic response of multilayer curved aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams under low-velocity impact

被引:34
作者
Zhang, Jianxun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yuan, Hui [1 ]
Li, Jianfeng
Meng, Jixing [3 ]
Huang, Wei
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Aerosp Engn, State Key Lab Strength & Vibrat Mech Struct, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Sichuan Prov, Failure Mech & Engn Disaster Prevent & Mitigat, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Jiangsu Key Lab Engn Mech, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
关键词
Multilayer curved honeycomb sandwich beam; Low-velocity impact; Failure mode; Load-carrying capacity; Energy absorption; PANELS; BEHAVIOR; COLLAPSE; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tws.2022.109446
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper, the dynamic response of multilayer curved aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams under low-velocity impact is investigated experimentally. The deformation process and final failure modes of multilayer curved aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams are observed and analyzed. The numerical calculation is conducted, and the numerical results are in good agreement with experimental ones. The effects of core thickness, core-thickness gradient, and gradient of inscribed circle diameters in upper and lower honeycombs on the load-carrying capacity and energy absorption of multilayer curved aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams are explored. It is shown that the multilayer curved sandwich beam has the best energy absorption capacity when the thicknesses of upper and lower cores are same. The total energy absorption of the specimen with the lower layer of 30 mm and the upper layer of 10 mm is 63.7% of that of the specimen with upper and lower layers of same thickness, and the total energy absorption of the specimen with the lower layer of 10 mm and the upper layer of 30 mm is 53.5% of that of the specimen with upper and lower layers of same thickness, respectively, under 40 J impact energy. In the range of curvature angle from 20 degrees to 60 degrees, the energy absorption capacity and mitigation ability of the multilayer curved sandwich beam can be effectively improved. Also, increasing the face-sheet thickness can effectively improve the energy absorption capability of multilayer curved sandwich beams.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Allen HG, 1969, Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels
[2]   A novel approach for in-plane vibration and damping analysis of arbitrarily curved laminated composite and sandwich beams [J].
Arikoglu, Aytac ;
Ozturk, Ahmet Gokay .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2020, 253
[3]   Impact response of sandwich beams with various curvatures and debonds [J].
Baba, Buket Okutan .
JOURNAL OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES & MATERIALS, 2013, 15 (02) :137-155
[4]   Impact Resistance Analysis of a Composite Double-Layer Honeycomb Sandwich Structure [J].
Bi, G. J. ;
Yin, J. P. ;
Wang, Z. J. ;
Han, Y. Y. ;
Jia, Z. J. .
STRENGTH OF MATERIALS, 2021, 53 (01) :126-133
[5]   Low-Velocity Impact Tests on Basalt Fiber/Polypropylene Core Honeycomb Sandwich Composites [J].
Bulut, M. .
MECHANICS OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2020, 56 (01) :121-130
[6]   Response and collapse of foam-supported sheet metal beams and shallow arches [J].
Corona, Edmundo ;
Wang, Jyhwen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2008, 45 (22-23) :5844-5855
[7]   Collapse modes in aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and impact loading [J].
Crupi, V. ;
Epasto, G. ;
Guglielmino, E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2012, 43 :6-15
[8]   Fabrication and bending behavior of thermoplastic composite curved corrugated sandwich beam with interface enhancement [J].
Du, Bing ;
Chen, Liming ;
Tan, Jingyan ;
Zhou, Hao ;
Zhao, Yang ;
Wu, Wenjun ;
Li, Weiguo ;
Fang, Daining ;
Chen, Liliang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 149 :101-111
[9]   Low-velocity impact failure of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels [J].
Foo, C. C. ;
Seah, L. K. ;
Chai, G. B. .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2008, 85 (01) :20-28
[10]   Low-velocity impact of sandwich composite plates [J].
Gustin, J ;
Mahinfalah, M ;
Jazar, GN ;
Aagaah, MR .
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 2004, 44 (06) :574-583