Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes

被引:30
作者
Choi, Won-Suh [1 ]
Kim, Jin-Sung [1 ]
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik [1 ]
Hur, Jung-Woo [1 ]
Seong, Ji-Hoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul 06591, South Korea
关键词
ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; COMPLICATIONS; FIXATION; TLIF; BONE;
D O I
10.1155/2016/2518394
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background. Minimally invasive spinal transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at L5-S1 is technically more demanding than it is at other levels because of the anatomical and biomechanical traits. Objective. To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF for treatment of single-level spinal stenosis low-grade isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1. Methods. Radiological data and electronic medical records of patients who underwent MIS-TLIF between May 2012 and December 2014 were reviewed. Fusion rate, cage position, disc height (DH), disc angle (DA), disc slope angle, segmental lordotic angle (SLA), lumbar lordotic angle (LLA), and pelvic parameters were assessed. For functional assessment, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and patient satisfaction rate (PSR) were utilized. Results. A total of 21 levels in 21 patients were studied. DH, DA, SLA, and LLA had increased from their preoperative measures at the final follow-up. Fusion rate was 86.7% (18/21) at 12 months' follow-up. The most common cage position was anteromedial (15/21). The mean VAS scores for back and leg pain mean ODI scores improved significantly at the final follow-up. PSR was 88%. Cage subsidence was observed in 33.3% (7/21). Conclusions. The clinical and radiologic outcomes after MIS-TLIF at L5-S1 in patients with spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis are generally favorable.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Contemporary management of isthmic spondylolisthesis: pediatric and adult [J].
Agabegi, Steven S. ;
Fischgrund, Jeffrey S. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (06) :530-543
[2]   Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages: an independent review of 71 cases [J].
Agazzi, S ;
Reverdin, A ;
May, D .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 91 (02) :186-192
[3]  
BRIDWELL KH, 1995, SPINE, V20, P1410, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199506000-00014
[4]   POSTERIOR SPINAL-FUSION SUPPLEMENTED WITH ONLY ALLOGRAFT BONE IN PARALYTIC SCOLIOSIS - DOES IT WORK [J].
BRIDWELL, KH ;
OBRIEN, MF ;
LENKE, LG ;
BALDUS, C ;
BLANKE, K .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (23) :2658-2666
[5]   Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up [J].
Dhall, Sanjay S. ;
Wang, Michael Y. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (06) :560-565
[6]   Foraminal and far lateral lumbar disc herniations: surgical alternatives and outcome measures [J].
Epstein, NE .
SPINAL CORD, 2002, 40 (10) :491-500
[7]   Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases [J].
Fan Shunwu ;
Zhao Xing ;
Zhao Fengdong ;
Fang Xiangqian .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) :1615-1620
[8]   Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach [J].
Fan, ShunWu ;
Hu, ZhiJun ;
Zhao, FengDong ;
Zhao, Xing ;
Huang, Yue ;
Fang, Xiangqian .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 19 (02) :316-324
[9]   Minimally invasive lumbar fusion [J].
Foley, KT ;
Holly, LT ;
Schwender, JD .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (15) :S26-S35
[10]   Axial Presacral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Posterior Fixation for Stabilization of Lumbosacral Isthmic Spondylolisthesis [J].
Gerszten, Peter C. ;
Tobler, William ;
Raley, Thomas J. ;
Miller, Larry E. ;
Block, Jon E. ;
Nasca, Richard J. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2012, 25 (02) :E36-E40