Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Part I-Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Associated Costs in Later Lines of Therapy in the United States

Background: Despite advances in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), a sizeable proportion of patients with CML-CP remains refractory or intolerant to these agents. Objectives: Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs were evaluated among patients with CML who received third or later lines of therapy (3L(+)), a clinical population that has not been previously well-studied, with unmet treatment needs as TKI therapy has repeatedly failed. Methods: Adult patients with CML who received 3L(+) were identified in the IBM (R) MarketScan (R) Databases (January 1, 2001-June 30, 2019) and the SEER-Medicare-linked database (January 1, 2006-December 31, 2016). Treatment patterns were observed from CML diagnosis. HRU and direct healthcare costs (payer's perspective, 2019 USD) were measured in a 3L(+) setting. Results: Among 296 commercially insured patients with 3L(+) (median age, 58.5 years; female, 49.7%), the median duration of first-line (1L), second-line (2L), and 3L therapy was 8.5, 4.2, and 8.3 months, respectively. The annual incidence rate during 3L(+) was 3.4 for inpatient days, 30.8 for days with outpatient services, and 1.2 for emergency department visits. Mean per-patient-per-month (PPPM) total healthcare costs (pharmacy + medical costs) were $18,784 in 3L(+), $15 206 in 3L, and $19 546 in 4L, with inpatient costs driving most of the difference between 3L and 4L (mean [3L] = $2528 PPPM, mean [4L] = $6847 PPPM). Among 53 Medicare-insured patients with 3L(+) (median age, 72.0 years; female, 39.6%), the median duration of 1L, 2L, and 3L therapy was 9.7, 5.0, and 7.0 months, respectively. During 3L(+), the annual incidence rate was 10.3 for inpatient days, 61.9 for days with outpatient services, and 1.5 for emergency department visits. Mean PPPM total healthcare costs were $14 311 in 3L(+), $15 100 in 3L, and $16 062 in 4L. Discussion: Patients with CML receiving 3L(+) rapidly cycled through multiple lines. Costs increased from 3L to 4L; in commercially insured patients, inpatient costs were responsible for most of the cost increase between 3L and 4L, underlying these patients' continued need for care. Conclusions: These findings support the need for better treatment options in patients with CML undergoing later lines of therapy.