The Environmental Footprint of Cities: Insights in the steps forward to a new Methodological Approach

被引:12
作者
Mirabella, Nadia [1 ]
Allacker, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Div Architectural Engn, Dept Architecture, Fac Engn Sci, Kasteelpk Arenberg 1, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
来源
SUSTAINABLE SYNERGIES FROM BUILDINGS TO THE URBAN SCALE | 2017年 / 38卷
关键词
City environmental footprint; Urban sustainability; Urban Metabolism; Life Cycle Assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.143
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Cities are complex entities which are constantly evolving, they are responsible for the largest share of most environmental impacts, but provide also major opportunities for improvement. Nevertheless, holistic methodologies to evaluate the environmental footprint of cities are still lacking at the urban scale level. Currently, carbon footprint and water footprint are the most used methods to evaluate the environmental performance of cities, despite their limited scope. The Urban Metabolism (UM) concept allows making an inventory of the flows into and out of the city, but it does not allow to interpret these flows in terms of environmental impacts. Life cycle assessment (LCA) provides this capability, but it is not yet feasible at urban scale. A first attempt to fuse the two approaches was made, but this proposal considers only four environmental indicators. It is clear that none of these methods can represent the whole environmental picture. Providing a new methodology adapt to urban context and extending the list of environmental impact categories is of paramount relevance to move towards a comprehensive and reliable environmental assessment able to guide cities on a sustainable transition path. For this reason, the main aims of this contribution are to give a comprehensive and critical insight in the most valuable and current available methods and tools able to assess the environmental burdens of cities, and at the same time trace the steps forward to propose a new methodology that could be capable to overcome the current gaps. This paper presents the first part of a broader research project which aims at developing a hybrid top-down and bottom-up approach to identify the contribution of the main flows at the macro-scale level, but also the main hotspots on the micro-scale level and the potential improvements. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 642
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Environmental and economic implications of energy efficiency in new residential buildings: A multi-criteria selection approach [J].
D'Agostino, Delia ;
Parker, Danny ;
Melia, Paco .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2019, 26
[42]   Identification and assessment of environmental aspects in an EMS context: an approach to a new reproducible method based on LCA methodology [J].
Zobel, T ;
Almroth, C ;
Bresky, J ;
Burman, JO .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2002, 10 (04) :381-396
[43]   Retro-Techno-Economic-Environmental Analysis (RTEEA) from the cradle: a new approach for process development [J].
Elias, Andrew M. ;
Furlan, Felipe F. ;
Ribeiro, Marcelo P. A. ;
Giordano, Roberto C. .
28TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2018, 43 :1541-1546
[44]   Economic costs and environmental benefits of deploying CCUS supply chains at scale: Insights from the source-sink matching LCA-MILP approach [J].
Nie, Shuai ;
Cai, Guotian ;
He, Jiaxin ;
Wang, Shaohua ;
Bai, Ruxue ;
Chen, Xiaoyu ;
Wang, Wenxiu ;
Zhou, Zhou .
FUEL, 2023, 344
[45]   A study of trilemma energy balance, clean energy transitions, and economic expansion in the midst of environmental sustainability: New insights from three trilemma leadership [J].
Khan, Irfan ;
Zakari, Abdulrasheed ;
Zhang, Jinjun ;
Dagar, Vishal ;
Singh, Sanjeet .
ENERGY, 2022, 248
[46]   Incorporating large-scale economic-environmental-energy coupling assessment and collaborative optimization into sustainable product footprint management: A graph-assisted life cycle energy efficiency enhancement approach [J].
Zhang, Tingwei ;
Zhong, Weimin ;
Liu, Yurong ;
Lu, Renzhi ;
Peng, Xin .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 329
[47]   A new approach for measuring the environmental sustainability of renewable energy production systems: Focused on the modelling of green gas production pathways [J].
Pierie, F. ;
Bekkering, J. ;
Benders, R. M. J. ;
van Gemert, W. J. Th ;
Moll, H. C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 162 :131-138
[48]   New Environmental Approach Based on a Combination of Planetary Boundaries and Life Cycle Assessment in the Wood-Based Bioadhesive Market [J].
Arias, Ana ;
Feijoo, Gumersindo ;
Moreira, Maria Teresa .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (34) :11257-11272
[49]   Transport decarbonization in big cities: An integrated environmental co-benefit analysis of vehicles purchases quota-limit and new energy vehicles promotion policy in Beijing [J].
Yang, Xi ;
Lin, Wanqi ;
Gong, Ruixin ;
Zhu, Mingzhe ;
Springer, Cecilia .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 71
[50]   Do industrial solid waste recycling and technological innovation promote low-carbon development in China? New insights from NARDL approach [J].
Quan, Zichuan ;
Xu, Xi ;
Wang, Weihao ;
Jiang, Jikun ;
Gao, Shuning .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 916