Environmental vulnerability assessment for mainland China based on entropy method

被引:238
作者
Zhao, Jincai [1 ]
Ji, Guangxing [1 ]
Tian, Yuan [2 ]
Chen, Yulong [1 ]
Wang, Zheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental vulnerability; Entropy method; Mainland China; RS and GIS; ECOLOGICAL VULNERABILITY; GROUNDWATER QUALITY; TIBETAN PLATEAU; HUNAN PROVINCE; GIS; REGION; IMPACT; RIVER; MANAGEMENT; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.016
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Evaluation of environmental vulnerability over large areas is a difficult and complex process because it is affected by many variables. Few research on environmental vulnerability assessment is conducted in mainland China comprehensively. In this study, indicators were selected mainly from the function of ecosystem factors and the natural environmental factors associated with the life of the residents. After collinearity diagnostics, 12 indicators remained, covering landform, meteorology, vegetation and irrigation conditions. Entropy method was used to determine the weights for indicators. Results indicate that the vulnerability degree in western China is significant higher than that of eastern China. The spatial distributions of vulnerability gradation are analyzed at national, regional and provincial scales, respectively. On the whole, areas of light vulnerability are main in the northeastern region. Potential, light and medium vulnerability occupy the largest area in the eastern and central region. Percentages of medium, heavy and very heavy vulnerability are the maximum in the western region. The change trend of vulnerability gradation showed that eco-environment has got more vulnerable since 2000. The evaluation results would provide references for the environmental protection and the formulation of related policies.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 422
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management [J].
Adriaenssens, V ;
De Baets, B ;
Goethals, PLM ;
De Pauw, N .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 319 (1-3) :1-12
[2]   Groundwater quality assessment using entropy weighted water quality index (EWQI) in Lenjanat, Iran [J].
Amiri, Vahab ;
Rezaei, Mohsen ;
Sohrabi, Nasim .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2014, 72 (09) :3479-3490
[3]   Zoning eco-environmental vulnerability for environmental management and protection [J].
Anh Kim Nguyen ;
Liou, Yuei-An ;
Li, Ming-Hsu ;
Tuan Anh Tran .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 69 :100-117
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CHINA ECOL INDIC
[5]   The weight of interaction of mining activities: groundwater in environmental impact assessment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) [J].
Aryafar, A. ;
Yousefi, S. ;
Ardejani, F. Doulati .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2013, 68 (08) :2313-2324
[6]   Evaluating environmental sensitivity at the basin scale through the use of geographic information systems and remotely sensed data: an example covering the Agri basin (Southern Italy) [J].
Basso, F ;
Bove, E ;
Dumontet, S ;
Ferrara, A ;
Pisante, M ;
Quaranta, G ;
Taberner, M .
CATENA, 2000, 40 (01) :19-35
[7]   Evaluation of methods for classifying epidemiological data on choropleth maps in series [J].
Brewer, CA ;
Pickle, L .
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2002, 92 (04) :662-681
[8]   Evaluation of basin environmental vulnerability: the weighted method compared to the compromise method [J].
Chang, C-L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 10 (05) :1051-1056
[9]   Fuzzy approach to the environmental impact evaluation [J].
Enea, M ;
Salemi, G .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2001, 136 (2-3) :131-147
[10]  
Enete I. C., 2010, Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, V12, P199