Hybrid abdominal robotic approach with conventional transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: feasibility and outcomes from a single institution

被引:18
作者
Nikolic, Amanda [1 ,2 ]
Waters, Peadar S. [1 ,4 ]
Peacock, Oliver [1 ,4 ]
Choi, Colin Chan-Min [1 ]
Rajkomar, Amrish [1 ]
Heriot, Alexander G. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Smart, Philip [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Warrier, Satish [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Epworth Healthcare, Gen Surg & Gastroenterol Clin Inst, Richmond, Australia
[2] Austin Hlth, Surg Ctr, Dept Surg, 145 Studley Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
[3] Eastern Hlth, Dept Surg, 5 Arnold St,Box Hill, Melbourne, Vic 3128, Australia
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Colorectal Surg Unit, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[5] Alfred Hosp, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Robotic surgery; Rectal cancer; Pelvic malignancy; Sphincter preservation; TaTME; Total mesorectal excision; Hybrid surgery; SHORT-TERM-OUTCOMES; SURGERY; RESECTION; QUALITY; NODES;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-019-01032-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Total mesorectal excision (TME) is currently recognised as the standard of care for patients with rectal cancer. Complete TME is known to be associated with lower rates of recurrence. Robotic and endoscopic TaTME approaches are reported to offer excellent proximal and distal rectal dissection into the TME plane, however, combining both approaches in a hybrid procedure could potentially optimise visualisation of the dissection plane and confer improved circumferential and distal margin rates. The aim of this study was to analyse the feasibility of a hybrid robotic abdominal approach with conventional TaTME for rectal cancer. Furthermore, pathological and patient outcomes were assessed. A review of prospectively maintained databases was undertaken to assess all patients undergoing robotic TME surgery for rectal tumours from August 2016 to October 2017. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics and outcomes were collated from patient charts and hospital databases. All patients underwent a modified Cecil approach after multidisciplinary team discussion. Eight patients (7 male, 1 female) underwent a combined hybrid approach with a median age of 60 years (range 47-73) and BMI of 29.5 (range 20-39.1) kg/m(2). Median distance from the anorectal junction (ARJ) was 7.5 (range 4-13) cm. Six patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment with chemoradiotherapy. Patients had a median length of stay (LOS) of 9 (range 4-33) days. There were no intra-operative complications encountered and no patients required a conversion to an open procedure. Complications included one anastomotic leak and one presacral collection. All patients had a complete TME with RO resection with a median number of lymph nodes harvested was 22 (range 6-37) lymph nodes. This hybrid technique is a feasible, practical and operatively favourable approach to rectal cancer surgery with initial pathological outcomes and complication profile equivalent to other approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 641
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] An assessment of an Australasian pathway for the introduction of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME)
    Abbott, S. C.
    Stevenson, A. R. L.
    Bell, S. W.
    Clark, D.
    Merrie, A.
    Hayes, J.
    Ganesh, S.
    Heriot, A. G.
    Warrier, S. K.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (01) : O1 - O6
  • [2] Transanal total mesorectal excision: full steam ahead
    Atallah, S.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2015, 19 (02) : 57 - 61
  • [3] Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution
    Atallah, S.
    Martin-Perez, B.
    Albert, M.
    deBeche-Adams, T.
    Nassif, G.
    Hunter, L.
    Larach, S.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (05) : 473 - 480
  • [4] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative Study
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Kwon, Hye Youn
    Kim, Jin Soo
    Hur, Hyuk
    Sohn, Seung Kook
    Cho, Chang Hwan
    Kim, Hoguen
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) : 1480 - 1487
  • [5] Bjorn MX, 2015, DAN MED J, V62
  • [6] Extent and completeness of mesorectal excision evaluated by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging
    Bondeven, P.
    Hagemann-Madsen, R. H.
    Laurberg, S.
    Pedersen, B. Ginnerup
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (10) : 1357 - 1367
  • [7] Combined transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) with laparoscopic instruments and abdominal robotic surgery in rectal cancer
    Bravo, R.
    Trepanier, J. -S.
    Arroyave, M. C.
    Fernandez-Hevia, M.
    Pigazzi, A.
    Lacy, A. M.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (03) : 233 - 235
  • [8] Transanal total mesorectal excision: a valid option for rectal cancer?
    Buchs, Nicolas C.
    Nicholson, Gary A.
    Ris, Frederic
    Mortensen, Neil J.
    Hompes, Roel
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (41) : 11700 - 11708
  • [9] Less Than 12 Nodes in the Surgical Specimen After Total Mesorectal Excision Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: It means more than you think!
    de Campos-Lobato, Luiz Felipe
    Stocchi, Luca
    de Sousa, Joao Batista
    Buta, Martin
    Lavery, Ian C.
    Fazio, Victor W.
    Dietz, David W.
    Kalady, Matthew F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (11) : 3398 - 3406
  • [10] COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer
    Deijen, Charlotte L.
    Velthuis, Simone
    Tsai, Alice
    Mavroveli, Stella
    de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M.
    Sietses, Colin
    Tuynman, Jurriaan B.
    Lacy, Antonio M.
    Hanna, George B.
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (08): : 3210 - 3215