Carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies

被引:69
作者
Schlesinger, Sabrina [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Doris S. M. [1 ]
Vingeliene, Snieguole [1 ]
Vieira, Ana R. [1 ]
Abar, Leila [1 ]
Polemiti, Elli [1 ]
Stevens, Christophe A. T. [1 ]
Greenwood, Darren C. [3 ]
Aune, Dagfinn [1 ,4 ]
Norat, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
[2] German Diabet Ctr, Inst Biometr & Epidemiol, Jr Res Grp Systemat Reviews, Aufm Hennekamp 65, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Bjorknes Univ Coll, Oslo, Norway
关键词
breast cancer; carbohydrates; glycemic index; glycemic load; meta-analysis; systematic review; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; DIETARY-FAT; ADOLESCENT DIET; DISEASE; NUTRITION; COHORT; FIBER;
D O I
10.1093/nutrit/nux010
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Context: The investigation of dose-response associations between carbohydrate intake, glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of breast cancer stratified by menopausal status, hormone receptor status, and body mass index (BMI) remains inconclusive. Objective: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analyses was conducted to investigate these associations. Data Sources: As part of the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Continuous Update Project, PubMed was searched up to May 2015 for relevant studies on these associations. Study Selection: Prospective studies reporting associations between carbohydrate intake, glycemic index, or glycemic load and breast cancer risk were included. Data Extraction: Two investigators independently extracted data from included studies. Results: Random-effects models were used to summarize relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity between subgroups, including menopausal status, hormone receptor status, and BMI was explored using meta-regression. Nineteen publications were included. The summary RRs (95% CIs) for breast cancer were 1.04 (1.00-1.07) per 10 units/d for glycemic index, 1.01 (0.98-1.04) per 50 units/d for glycemic load, and 1.00 (0.96-1.05) per 50 g/d for carbohydrate intake. For glycemic index, the association appeared slightly stronger among postmenopausal women (summary RR per 10 units/d, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10) than among premenopausal women, though the difference was not statistically significant (Pheterogeneity = 0.15). Glycemic load and carbohydrate intake were positively associated with breast cancer among postmenopausal women with estrogen-negative tumors (summary RR for glycemic load, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.52; and summary RR for carbohydrates, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25). No differences in BMI were detected. Conclusions: Menopausal and hormone receptor status, but not BMI, might be potential influencing factors for the associations between carbohydrate intake, glycemic index, glycemic load, and breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 441
页数:22
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CONT UPD WORLD CANC
[2]   Carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies [J].
Aune, D. ;
Chan, D. S. M. ;
Lau, R. ;
Vieira, R. ;
Greenwood, D. C. ;
Kampman, E. ;
Norat, T. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (04) :521-535
[3]   Prediction of postprandial glycemia and insulinemia in lean, young, healthy adults: glycemic load compared with carbohydrate content alone [J].
Bao, Jiansong ;
Atkinson, Fiona ;
Petocz, Peter ;
Willett, Walter C. ;
Brand-Miller, Jennie C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2011, 93 (05) :984-996
[4]   Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk - a metaanalysis of observational studies [J].
Barclay, Alan W. ;
Petocz, Peter ;
McMillan-Price, Joanna ;
Flood, Victoria M. ;
Prvan, Tania ;
Mitchell, Paul ;
Brand-Miller, Jennie C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2008, 87 (03) :627-637
[5]   DIETARY-FAT, CALORIES, AND THE RISK OF BREAST-CANCER IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN - A PROSPECTIVE POPULATION-BASED STUDY [J].
BARRETTCONNOR, E ;
FRIEDLANDER, NJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 1993, 12 (04) :390-399
[6]   Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from 3 large US cohorts and an updated meta-analysis [J].
Bhupathiraju, Shilpa N. ;
Tobias, Deirdre K. ;
Malik, Vasanti S. ;
Pan, An ;
Hruby, Adela ;
Manson, JoAnn E. ;
Willett, Walter C. ;
Hu, Frank B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2014, 100 (01) :218-232
[7]   The glycemic index issue [J].
Brand-Miller, Jennie ;
Buyken, Anette E. .
CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) :62-67
[8]   Glycemic index, glycemic load and invasive breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women: The PREDIMED study [J].
Castro-Quezada, Itandehui ;
Sanchez-Villegas, Almudena ;
Martinez-Gonzalez, Miguel A. ;
Salas-Salvado, Jordi ;
Corella, Dolores ;
Estruch, Ramon ;
Schroeder, Helmut ;
Alvarez-Perez, Jacqueline ;
Ruiz-Lopez, Maria D. ;
Artacho, Reyes ;
Ros, Emilio ;
Bullo, Monica ;
Sorli, Jose V. ;
Fito, Montserrat ;
Ruiz-Gutierrez, Valentina ;
Toledo, Estefania ;
Buil-Cosiales, Pilar ;
Garcia Rodriguez, Antonio ;
Lapetra, Jose ;
Pinto, Xavier ;
Salaverria, Itziar ;
Tur, Josep A. ;
Romaguera, Dora ;
Tresserra-Rimbau, Anna ;
Serra-Majem, Lluis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (06) :524-532
[9]   Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of diabetes-related cancers: a meta-analysis [J].
Choi, Yuni ;
Giovannucci, Edward ;
Lee, Jung Eun .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2012, 108 (11) :1934-1947
[10]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188