Using machine learning for sequence-level automated MRI protocol selection in neuroradiology

被引:53
作者
Brown, Andrew D. [1 ,2 ]
Marotta, Thomas R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
radiology; MRI; machine learning; quality improvement; patient safety; clinical decision support; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEMS; RADIOLOGY; DISRUPTORS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocx125
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Incorrect imaging protocol selection can lead to important clinical findings being missed, contributing to both wasted health care resources and patient harm. We present a machine learning method for analyzing the unstructured text of clinical indications and patient demographics from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) orders to automatically protocol MRI procedures at the sequence level. We compared 3 machine learning models - support vector machine, gradient boosting machine, and random forest - to a baseline model that predicted the most common protocol for all observations in our test set. The gradient boosting machine model significantly outperformed the baseline and demonstrated the best performance of the 3 models in terms of accuracy (95%), precision (86%), recall (80%), and Hamming loss (0.0487). This demonstrates the feasibility of automating sequence selection by applying machine learning to MRI orders. Automated sequence selection has important safety, quality, and financial implications and may facilitate improvements in the quality and safety of medical imaging service delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 571
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Nuckols T.K. ;
Smith-Spangler C. ;
Morton S.C. ;
Asch S.M. ;
Patel V.M. ;
Anderson L.J. ;
Deichsel E.L. ;
Shekelle P.G. .
Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
[12]   Quantitative analysis of focal masses at MR imaging: A plea for standardization [J].
Pijl, MEJ ;
Doornbos, J ;
Wasser, MNJM ;
van Houwelingen, HC ;
Tollenaar, RAEM ;
Bloem, JL .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (03) :737-744
[13]  
Rosenthal Daniel I, 2006, J Am Coll Radiol, V3, P799, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.05.006
[14]  
Roshanov PS, 2011, IMPLEMENT SCI, V6, DOI [10.1186/1748-5908-6-92, 10.1186/1748-5908-6-88]
[15]   BoosTexter: A boosting-based system for text categorization [J].
Schapire, RE ;
Singer, Y .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2000, 39 (2-3) :135-168
[16]   Radiology Workflow Disruptors: A Detailed Analysis [J].
Schemmel, Andrew ;
Lee, Matthew ;
Hanley, Taylor ;
Pooler, B. Dustin ;
Kennedy, Tabassum ;
Field, Aaron ;
Wiegmann, Douglas ;
Yu, John-Paul J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (10) :1210-1214
[17]   Effect of Computerized Order Entry with Integrated Decision Support on the Growth of Outpatient Procedure Volumes: Seven-year Time Series Analysis [J].
Sistrom, Christopher L. ;
Dang, Pragya A. ;
Weilburg, Jeffrey B. ;
Dreyer, Keith J. ;
Rosenthal, Daniel I. ;
Thrall, James H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (01) :147-155
[18]  
Supanich MP, 2017, CT MRI WHOLE BODY 2, P3
[19]  
Swensen Stephen J, 2005, J Am Coll Radiol, V2, P992, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.08.003
[20]   Interpretive Error in Radiology [J].
Waite, Stephen ;
Scott, Jinel ;
Gale, Brian ;
Fuchs, Travis ;
Kolla, Srinivas ;
Reede, Deborah .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (04) :739-749