A phase II study of gemcitabine plus oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Mok, TSK [1 ]
Zee, B
Chan, ATC
Yeo, W
Yang, WT
Yim, A
Leung, SF
Nguyen, B
Leung, TWT
Johnson, P
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Canc Inst Canada, Dept Biostat, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Lilly Corp Ctr, Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
gemcitabine; oral etoposide; advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma; non-cisplatin-based regimen; toxicity;
D O I
10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<543::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO;2-V
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The authors have designed a non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). This regimen capitalizes on the mild toxicity of gemcitabine, a novel nucleoside analog. METHODS. A total of 46 chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Eligible patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15, plus oral etoposide 50 mg daily for 14 days, which was increased to 21 days if there was no World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 3 or 4 toxicity in the 1st 2 cycles (each cycle was 28 days long). All patients were included for analysis of response and survival according to an intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS. The overall response rate was 43.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.7-60.2%). There was 1 complete response (2.2%) and 19 partial responses (41.3%). The median survival was 48.0 weeks (95% CI, 38.1-75.9 weeks) and the 1-year survival rate was 45% (95% CI, 29-62%). The median time to progression for all patients was 39.2 weeks (95% CI, 35.7-49.7 weeks). World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 3 and 4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was reported in 29%, 32%, and 18% of patients, respectively. Two patients had reactivation of hepatitis B viral infection that resulted in WHO Grade 4 hepatic dysfunction. Other nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS. This non-cisplatin-based regimen of gemcitabine and oral etoposide achieved a high response and survival rate. Toxicity appeared to be less severe than that associated with existing cisplatin-based regimens. A randomized study of this regimen versus a cisplatin-based regimen is indicated. (C) 2000 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 550
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Fan, Yun
    Lin, Neng-ming
    Ma, Sheng-lin
    Luo, Lue-hong
    Fang, Luo
    Huang, Zhi-yu
    Yu, Hai-feng
    Wu, Feng-qin
    ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 31 (06) : 746 - 752
  • [32] A phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced bilharzial bladder carcinoma
    Khaled, H. M.
    Hamza, M. R.
    Mansour, O.
    Gaafar, R.
    Zaghloul, M. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 : S34 - S37
  • [33] A phase II study of raltitrexed and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma
    Arends, JJ
    Sleeboom, HP
    Leys, MBL
    Huinink, DT
    de Jong, RS
    Smit, JM
    Nortier, JWR
    Tesselaar, MET
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (03) : 445 - 448
  • [34] Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in the second-line treatment of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma patients - A minnie pearl cancer research network Phase II trial
    Hainsworth, JD
    Burris, HA
    Litchy, S
    Erland, JB
    Hon, JK
    Brierre, JE
    Greco, FA
    CANCER, 2000, 88 (06) : 1353 - 1358
  • [35] Randomized phase II study of carboplatin/gemcitabine versus vinorelbine/gemcitabine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer - West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 0104
    Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
    Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
    Uejima, Hisao
    Sugiura, Takahiko
    Takada, Yoshiki
    Negoro, Shun-ichi
    Matsui, Kaoru
    Kashii, Tatsuhiko
    Takada, Minoru
    Nakanishi, Yoichi
    Kato, Terufumi
    Fukuoka, Masahiro
    CANCER, 2006, 107 (03) : 599 - 605
  • [36] Weekly docetaxel with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma - Phase II trials of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network
    Hainsworth, JD
    Burris, HA
    Billings, FT
    Bradof, JE
    Baker, M
    Greco, FA
    CANCER, 2001, 92 (09) : 2391 - 2398
  • [37] Flexible chemotherapy regimen with gemcitabine and vinorelbine for metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma -: A phase II multicenter trial
    Hirsh, V
    Langleben, A
    Ayoub, J
    Cormier, Y
    Pintos, J
    Iglésias, JL
    CANCER, 2001, 92 (04) : 830 - 835
  • [38] Phase II study of erlotinib plus gemcitabine in first-line treatment of poor prognosis, advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients
    Grigorescu, A. C.
    Bala, C.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2013, 18 (01): : 188 - 194
  • [39] Second-Line Treatment with Intravenous Gemcitabine and Oral Etoposide in Platinum-Resistant Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients: Results of a Phase II Study
    Bruzzone, M.
    Centurioni, M. G.
    Giglione, P.
    Gualco, M.
    Merlo, D. F.
    Miglietta, L.
    Cosso, M.
    Giannelli, F.
    Cristoforoni, P.
    Ferrarini, M.
    ONCOLOGY, 2011, 80 (3-4) : 238 - 246
  • [40] Gemcitabine plus etoposide in chemonaive extensive disease small-cell lung cancer:: A multi-centre phase II study
    Vansteenkiste, J
    Gatzemeier, U
    Manegold, C
    Hanauske, A
    Weynants, P
    Bosquée, L
    Blatter, J
    Mansouri, K
    von Pawel, J
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (06) : 835 - 840