Prognostics Comparison of Lithium-Ion Battery Based on the Shallow and Deep Neural Networks Model

被引:32
作者
Long, Bing [1 ]
Li, Xiangnan [1 ]
Gao, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Liu, Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] UESTC, Sch Automat Engn, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
lithium-ion battery; prognostics; remaining useful life (RUL); nonlinear autoregressive (NAR); long-short term memory (LSTM); PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; LIFE PREDICTION; DIAGNOSTICS;
D O I
10.3390/en12173271
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Prognostics of the remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries is a crucial role in the battery management systems (BMS). An artificial neural network (ANN) does not require much knowledge from the lithium-ion battery systems, thus it is a prospective data-driven prognostic method of lithium-ion batteries. Though the ANN has been applied in prognostics of lithium-ion batteries in some references, no one has compared the prognostics of the lithium-ion batteries based on different ANN. The ANN generally can be classified to two categories: the shallow ANN, such as the back propagation (BP) ANN and the nonlinear autoregressive (NAR) ANN, and the deep ANN, such as the long short-term memory (LSTM) NN. An improved LSTM NN is proposed in order to achieve higher prediction accuracy and make the construction of the model simpler. According to the lithium-ion data from the NASA Ames, the prognostics comparison of lithium-ion battery based on the BP ANN, the NAR ANN, and the LSTM ANN was studied in detail. The experimental results show: (1) The improved LSTM ANN has the best prognostic accuracy and is more suitable for the prediction of the RUL of lithium-ion batteries compared to the BP ANN and the NAR ANN; (2) the NAR ANN has better prognostic accuracy compared to the BP ANN.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Bian MM, 2010, PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMAGE ANALYSIS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, P1, DOI 10.1109/GROUP4.2010.5643446
[2]  
Duan YJ, 2016, 2016 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), P1053, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2016.7795686
[3]   Life prediction and reliability assessment of lithium secondary batteries [J].
Eom, Seung-Wook ;
Kim, Min-Kyu ;
Kim, Ick-Jun ;
Moon, Seong-In ;
Sun, Yang-Kook ;
Kim, Hyun-Soo .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2007, 174 (02) :954-958
[4]   Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM [J].
Gers, FA ;
Schmidhuber, J ;
Cummins, F .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2000, 12 (10) :2451-2471
[5]  
Graves A, 2012, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V385, P1, DOI [10.1162/neco.1997.9.1.1, 10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2]
[6]   Prognostics implementation of electronics under vibration loading [J].
Gu, Jie ;
Barker, Donald ;
Pecht, Michael .
MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2007, 47 (12) :1849-1856
[7]   Robust Online Time Series Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networks [J].
Guo, Tian ;
Xu, Zhao ;
Yao, Xin ;
Chen, Haifeng ;
Aberer, Karl ;
Funaya, Koichi .
PROCEEDINGS OF 3RD IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND ADVANCED ANALYTICS, (DSAA 2016), 2016, :816-825
[8]   A State of Health Estimation Framework for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Transfer Components Analysis [J].
Jia, Bowen ;
Guan, Yong ;
Wu, Lifeng .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (13)
[9]   Improved diagnostics for the incipient faults in analog circuits using LSSVM based on PSO algorithm with Mahalanobis distance [J].
Long, Bing ;
Xian, Weiming ;
Li, Min ;
Wang, Houjun .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2014, 133 :237-248
[10]   An improved autoregressive model by particle swarm optimization for prognostics of lithium-ion batteries [J].
Long, Bing ;
Xian, Weiming ;
Jiang, Lin ;
Liu, Zhen .
MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2013, 53 (06) :821-831