Augmented Backward Elimination: A Pragmatic and Purposeful Way to Develop Statistical Models

被引:141
作者
Dunkler, Daniela [1 ]
Plischke, Max [2 ]
Leffondre, Karen [3 ]
Heinze, Georg [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Stat Informat & Intelligent Syst, Sect Clin Biometr, Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Internal Med 3, Div Nephrol & Dialysis, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Bordeaux Segalen, ISPED, Ctr Rech, INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France
关键词
REGRESSION-ANALYSIS; CAUSAL DIAGRAMS; SELECTION; SIMULATION; CRITERION; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0113677
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Statistical models are simple mathematical rules derived from empirical data describing the association between an outcome and several explanatory variables. In a typical modeling situation statistical analysis often involves a large number of potential explanatory variables and frequently only partial subject-matter knowledge is available. Therefore, selecting the most suitable variables for a model in an objective and practical manner is usually a non-trivial task. We briefly revisit the purposeful variable selection procedure suggested by Hosmer and Lemeshow which combines significance and change-in-estimate criteria for variable selection and critically discuss the change-in-estimate criterion. We show that using a significance-based threshold for the change-in-estimate criterion reduces to a simple significance-based selection of variables, as if the change-in-estimate criterion is not considered at all. Various extensions to the purposeful variable selection procedure are suggested. We propose to use backward elimination augmented with a standardized change-in-estimate criterion on the quantity of interest usually reported and interpreted in a model for variable selection. Augmented backward elimination has been implemented in a SAS macro for linear, logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. The algorithm and its implementation were evaluated by means of a simulation study. Augmented backward elimination tends to select larger models than backward elimination and approximates the unselected model up to negligible differences in point estimates of the regression coefficients. On average, regression coefficients obtained after applying augmented backward elimination were less biased relative to the coefficients of correctly specified models than after backward elimination. In summary, we propose augmented backward elimination as a reproducible variable selection algorithm that gives the analyst more flexibility in adopting model selection to a specific statistical modeling situation.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Applied Survival Analysis: Time-to-Event
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Multivariable model-building: a pragmatic approach to regression analysis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuous variables
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, STAT ANAL SOFTWARE V
[4]   Understanding confounding and mediation [J].
Babyak, Michael A. .
EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2009, 12 (03) :68-71
[5]   Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models [J].
Bender, R ;
Augustin, T ;
Blettner, M .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (11) :1713-1723
[6]   Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression [J].
Bursac, Zoran ;
Gauss, C. Heath ;
Williams, David Keith ;
Hosmer, David W. .
SOURCE CODE FOR BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2008, 3 (01)
[7]  
Dunkler D, 2014, ABE SAS MACRO AUGMEN
[8]   Combining directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure as a novel approach to adjustment-variable selection in epidemiology [J].
Evans, David ;
Chaix, Basile ;
Lobbedez, Thierry ;
Verger, Christian ;
Flahault, Antoine .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
[9]   CONTROL OF CONFOUNDING IN THE ASSESSMENT OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
NEUTRA, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1980, 9 (04) :361-367
[10]   Quantifying biases in causal models:: Classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias [J].
Greenland, S .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (03) :300-306